Quote ="guess who"Quote ="Stealth Comic"To be honest I think it was a question posed to cunjure up a bit of debate, not necessarily an opinion.
I did something similar when I put a captaincy thread on after the Batley game.'"
The thing is you can see the point of the first post, debate.
To many people cant. To many people read into it, what they want to read into it.
At no point did i say anything about how the team should go on to lose a game by not playing to there best. Yet once again certain people are implying that i did.
Would any one like to show me where i said we should lose games?
I see GP is having ago at my role on the fund raising committee, because of my first post. GP try reading what is written, rather than once again twisting it to suit your agenda.'"
You asked a question [i"Is playing well a good thing"[/i
Expressed an opinion [i"Now this is where, i think it will be a real problem"[/i
Then got a series of reasoned answers - in my book thats debate. The fact that you don't like the answers then accuse people of misunderstanding you (reading what they want to see) perhaps indicates that your original post was poorly constructed. I've read the original post again, with several different spectacles on, and still believe the implication is that if we want to keep our coach and players we should play badly. You may not have intended it, but it's what comes across, and that so many have picked up on it perhaps illustrates my point.
I'm not arguing of course, just entering into the debate
