Who knows - we're paper thin at the position now other than Gibson, Gilyard, Amendola and Robinson.

We've got Danario Alexander on the practice squad who could be a very good player in the future if he can overcome his injuries but I don't think he's up to full fitness or ready yet

I've read some people mention Devin Thomas who got cut by the Redskins not too long ago as well

I was going to say I think you will pick-up Devin Thomas.

Bradford this year,Sanchez and Stafford last year and Flacco and Ryan the year before all showed potential in their rookie year,all Clausen has shown so far is he's in over his head.You said Clausen would be a top QB so far your wrong about that and nothing he's done has shown you might be right.You keep saying Cassell is the worst starting QB inthe NFL when the stats clearly show he's not.All i'm doing is pointing out your opinions on QB's are not backed up by the play on the field.

We all dream of a team of Millers.

Outstanding D. Special teams is going to cost us here. I can feel it!

The stats say that Vick is the 2nd best QB in the NFL and Mark Sanchez the 3rd. It's seems odd to decide to pan Clausen after he has started 3 games(i think) on probably the 2nd worst team in the NFL right now. His one receiving weapon is out injured as well.

I'm not sold on Clausen but to write him off already is not fair. Flacco went into a challenger team, Sanchez was bailed out by his defence and Stafford had weapons to throw to.

Can't believe I'm agreeing with Conroy again

Anyone but Malcom Floyd FFS

I've got him in 2 leagues

25.5 points hes the only player my opponent in the TDUK fantasy league has left!!

The more he gets the more I need AP to get to win me the game!

Hes 13 points up now

Philip Rivers MVP

He's got 32.5 in my PPR league

I lead by 80 in that one!

Hes not called Manning so he has no chance!!

These refs: The words p[ii[/issup and brewery come to mind

Your allowed to agree with him but it just means your wrong aswell

I'm very glad we have taken Bradford over him, don't get me wrong. I just think writing someone off so quick isn't a smart thing to do. Eli was shiite his first season at the Giants(I think) but he's now a Superbowl winning QB.

Clausen has shown promise. He was very good in the pre-season and ran Moore close for the start. I've seen enough of him in college and enough about him in general to know he will be a very good QB. I'm convinced of it.

Bradford is on a team with nothing to lose and is often playing from behind. Sanchez was poor last year, like all of the Jets he is over-rated because the Colts decided they didn't want to be undefeated. Flacco and Ryan have landed on their feet with very good teams.

That is irrelevant though, they are rookies. It is a steep learning curve as you know. I do not judge a rookie QB to the same standard and your clutching at straws to say i'm wrong about Cassell because a 3 game rookie on an 0-5 team may have had a worse game.

I stand by what i've said. Cassell is the worst starting QB in the NFL taking all things into consideration. He consistently checks down and even then is inaccurate (54% completion), but of course i'm wrong because Clausen only completes 49%.



Stats don't tell the whole story, watching Cassell IMO paints a worse picture. He is like a headless chicken.

Nothing to do with the fact his #1 WR can't catch a simple catch in the end zone? or the #2 WR can't get open? his only targets are his RB's and TE, no QB can be effective with "weapons" like that, Kansas badly need 2 legit WR's.

Its a rollercoaster watching the Raiders then I guess?

Is it just me that thinks this game seems to have taken an age? And theres loads of time left!!

Oh you better believe it is.



1st down inside the Chargers 8

Id challenge that Miller "TD" TBH

I think it's the fact that ST CONROY is a Packers fan makes me want to argue with him and show him up when he is wrong about something

Yep, when it was getting on to HT I thought it was already in the 3rd

it must be the slowest game I've watched, aren't the games usually done by 12-half 12?