Sam needs to stay at 6, lets not do a massive rejig, lets just put Amos to 1 and bring in a winger.

Agreed, and I would be happy to see any of Goulding, Pryce or Ainscough there tbh.

Did you really go today?
How did Ian Thornley play? a very talented young player.

Which centre scored and put his winger in for two tries?

I didn't to the game but was the centre Pryce, by any chance????

Very sensible thing to do. Maguire does seem very sensible.

Pretty sure Maguire wont rejig the entire backline because of one injury. It's either Vievers to fullback or Pryce, Ainscough, Goulding on the wing.

In Madge we trust

I'd rather have smelly Harry in the side than Pryce !!

Please don't start that phrase off, we sound like wire

Good point.

Correct, but heaven forbid if he picks Pryce. The boo boys will be sharpening their knives now.

I hope not, Maguires given everyone a clean slate, that's the least we should do.

Of course they will, the irony being they are the same clowns who cheer when #18 on the teamsheet is read out.

EGGSACTLEY.

Loving the snobbery from the usual suspects on here, just because other people have different opinions. Keep it up!

Well given you watch the under 20's what is your opinion on this? Should he pick Pryce or go for Ainscough or Goulding?

You often used the "do you watch the under 21's" argument least season so given you do, give us the benefit of your opinion as to who of those three he should play

.

Dave

I just want to know which centre scored and put his winger in for two tries???????????

O I get it I have just looked at the other site, it was Pryce and he sent Marsh in for 2 tries.

And scored himself. Not brilliant by any means but a fair bit different from the hobbling around doing sod all impression previously given. And no mention of Ian Thornley's performance by the same person so keen to point out Karl's alleged failing.

I'm not affraid 2 state that the anti Pryce attitude on this board is plain wrong some times!

As far as I'm aware Pryce is a WRLFC player and thus I can't see the point in the constanst bit€hing that goes on against him calling not only his heart but also his talent into question. What purpose do those fans think this will achieve? All it promotes is failure for the player and team in the long run.

If Pryce is selected next week then I for one will be happy for the lad and i'll also cheer him on as well as at the end of the day a top performance from Pryce benefits the team and a win for Wigan makes me happy.

Some people would rather us lose and Pryce 2 have a stinker so they can say I told you so!

I disagree. I don't think there is anyone who wants him to fail and I think we all hope he will be a great player for us.

Dave

So why do some continue to almost revel in anything that might possibly be negative about the guy, even going so far as to distort facts, or misrepresent situations just to try and back up their belief that he's a waste of time? Surely if a few are going that far, then they can hardly be wanting him to succeed can they?.

Nobody is reveling in it. It's just not surprising whenever something happens with Pryce. Obviously he'll be cheered. It was a minority of =#FF0000(you've been warned before about the use of that word. Take this as your final warning) that were booing him in the first place.

Yes i did go today , pryce put his winger stefan march in for 2 tries. he even scored himself . think that was in the first half hour. It was men agains boys out there.but my previous post is also acurate as regards to pryce. Ian ran well caused them all sorts of problems.as did ocarroll.

Your negativity regarding Pryce shines through.



Forgetting to mention that he played the full 80, scored one try and put Marsh in for two. He touched the ball a few more times than one in the second half, but Wigans ball control in the second half was appalling (Wigan were leading 36 - 0) at half time only scoring two tries in the second half, it was hardly Pryces fault was it? The reason I brought Thornley into the debate (I player I rate highly) is that Pryce created far more than he did yet it's Pryce getting the stick, why?

Remember last week


When again you conveniently forgot to mention the reason Pryce went off was that he got a smack in the mouth and was bleeding, so by the rules of the game had to go off to get it stitched. You then conveniently forgot to mention McIlorun and Walker went off injured and did not return but Pryce did.

I'm no saying that Pryce was outstanding in either of the games, but giving a balanced view of what actually happened.

Richards to Fullback
Ainscough/Pryce to Wing depending on how Ainscough has gone at Widnes and how Pryce has trained