Nope. The results and performance over a number of games reflect if the player was missed.
It's very black and white. Did we miss him? No. How can I say that? Cos we haven't lost in his absence.

You're wasting your breath last son, did you not know, you are not allowed to have a different opinion to anybody else on this forum, if you dont agree with the "clique" you are just wasting your time!

I aint in any clique and if i agreed with him i would say but this thread is stupid

He is saying that the results are down to 1 player which is not true

I'd like to take this opportunity to thank 'Last Son of Wigan' for cheering me up when I'm in work. Absolutely cracking thread that has to be a contender for thread of the year. Brilliant.

I'll just carry on. Anyone with even half a brain can see there are many posters on here who are inbreds. Love to pick and do what they can to have a pop at someone's opinion.
Sad thing is many in here don't even get it. They think I'm having some massive pop at Hansen when in truth I'm pointing out a clear fact about the teams performances in his absence.
I only even bothered after the I took for it when mentioning it.

It's a pity our club is followed by so many retards. It's why other clubs and places in the UK think Wigan is full of yocals.

I never said the results are down to one player. I said Hansen wasn't missed. FFS!
Go and get some sugar to pour down your windows, itll make them taste better for you.

Love the pic, what are you 12?

Why is the thread stupid?? I thought the idea of a forum was for people to discuss matters and give their opinions?? there was a thread recently about wether hansen would be missed, Last son of Wigan got slaughtered for having the opinion that he would not be missed as we have other SR forwards that could step up and do a good job in his absence.

Now several weeks later having won every game since he has been out, Last Son of Wigan is now asking the question has he been missed??? The answer is no, he has not. I am a fan of Hansen myself and do believe he has a part in the squad but given our form over the last few weeks he simply has not been missed.

DAMN... OP is quite right...!!!!! We should sell HH and buy an expensive Aussie, causing us to be weaker in other areas. HH is non quota, and would wlk into anyother side in SL

Insults now great

Grow up if you want a discuss the topic stay on it

Oh my god there's a break through. Someone can actually understand the point.

Even a 12-year-old would have more RL sense than you mate going off this thread.

Go on then, show us where anybody has suggested selling HH and replacing him with an Aussie???? The whole argument was that we have a young SR from WIGAN that can do just as good a job as HH

Insults? Look through the entire thread. If there's one person who's been insulted it's me. All for having an opinion.

He's been one of our best players for a few years

I even said that we have depth in our squad so if i a player is injured it wont affect us the only player who would be missed is paaaaat for his kicking thats it sam wouldn't be missed and he's that good but you can give credit to all the coaches down at the club for bringing these young lads on

Who ever said anything about an Aussie? Don't forget it was also me who was hammered for suggesting we should look at our own talent first.

So when did I ever say anything about replacing H with an Aussie?

Explain.

I aint insulted you i might have said your clueless and this thread is stupid which i think it is


A question for you if all our team was fit who would you pick before hansen?

Clueless is an insult!
Your question is a different topic all together!

That is your opinion, personally I think the suggestion that he has been one of our best players is a bit far, he's a good squad player. The point is that Last Son has the right to his opinion and should not be lambasted for it being different to anybody elses!

Posters are now fabricating new questions and using them to attack me! It gets better! They don't seem to be able to understand the original post.

Ok if you take that as an insult i'm sorry

How is that question a different topic?

I posted this on page 2

What do you think my original post/point is?

Everyone gets your point but i think everyone wants to know why you have brought it up?

Your saying we haven't lost without him which is pretty much saying we dont need him when infact he's one of our best forwards for a second row the guy can shift and he's very strong he gives 100% week in week out