I thought you'd know Keith.

So are you confirming that every tackle that has made contact with the head has had a red card this year?

Child is an awful ref agreed but it was the correct decision.

We only have one good ref in this sport in this country and that is Mr Steve Ganson, all the others are absloute idiots. Its ok to make a couple of mistakes every now and then - they are only human, but its just ridiculous how inconsistant & how many stupid mistakes they make, it puts the game in a bad light.

Who's the ref in 2 weeks time?

Where can I place my bet on who it'll be?

Bent Refs!?? Are you kidding me? You were winning the Penalty Count 10-4 until he decided to even it up towards the end.

I agree with a previous poster that it may be a good thing that Andy was given a straight red rather than a "video review" decision, the game was won and instead of a potential two game ban he will get a 1 game ban or even a sending off sufficeint.



Congratulations Andy on the new baby..

The penalty against Joel for a supposed ball steal was completely baffling.

Do you always get off on being so self righteous?

Again for the slow people like yourself it wasn't bad enough to warrent a red. If you can't give a yellow for it then a penalty should have been given.

Do you have Keiron Cunningham Pyjamas?

Correction. All refs. have the guts they just wont make the big calls against the other so called big teams they just choose to make them against us

Yes, they can be used quite nicely as a 24-berth tent and garage combination.

Very Poor attempt. I only ask because you seem to have a complete love of all things Cunningham. I don't think you go a week without mentioning him on here, either this board or the Saints Board. It's really a quite worrying obsession that you have with him.

It's hard to argue against a swinging arm that makes first contact with the head. Personally I thought a red card was a bit harsh though. Elima was pretty low to the ground and that made it look a lot worse than it actully was. I'm just interested to see if any similar tackles that happen next week get punished in the same manner

No need to be self righteous - just helping you stop digging an even bigger hole for yourself.

It usually helps before going off on one to try and find out what you're talking about, otherwise you look a bit silly - the RFL website is full of info to help you.

what about him getting one round the "snotbox"when he scored--nowt wrong wi that then?????

i dont think it was elima he hit... it was fakir!!
i agree he was low to the ground, i think coley will get 1 game for it

No arguments with a send off, but it was poor technique and reckless rather than intentional. I'd be disappointed if he got more than a match ban given I've seen much worse this season go unpunished. Consistency is the problem - Peacock put in two similarly mistimed attempts making contact above the shoulder in the cup game and got away with it because of who he is rather than what he did.

Fakir wasn't low to the ground he was running straight. Right decision for me.

Having just come in from the pub and without having read the last 7 pages.

Let me guess - Wire fans wanting a 2 match ban?

Yep

If you want someting to moan about I'd complain about why another player got penalised for a late hit on the kicker without getting sinbinned. Happened in the leeds v stains game yesterday and happened again today

To be fair I thought Mossops late hit about a minute after this on the person who had passed the ball was just as bad, if not worse, and he only got penalised too.

he was commited to that challenge, it was a shoulder charge and shouldnt have a been a penalty.