BBC Radio 5 Live have just had a feature talking about this weekend's sport.
Not one mention of the Challenge Cup final being shown by, you guessed it, the BBC.
The Australia-Scotland one day cricket match and the Belgian grand prix were both featured.
As a finishing tag the news that the Harlequins rugby union chairman has stepped down was repeated.
It beggars belief really.

Strangely though, BBC Radio 1 have had features all day on the CC Final.

Heard it on Radio 1 this morning about 7 o'clock.

Thats what happens when theres no big sides playing in it

Any score that follows the pattern huddersfield "more" and Warrington "less" will do for me, but even better would be Huddersfield "a lot more" and Warrington "considerably less".

No, not bitter at all - we didn't play well enough on the day. I just think Huddersfield will be too good for you and that if you do lose you have nothing left to fall back on.

Huddersfield 78
Warrington 4

nofl

Didnt loose so, we dont need a fall back!!

Weren't far off

This thread is amazing bitters...unlucky. The parade starts 4ish if you want to attend.

i'll be going
c'mon the wire.

and you were soooooooo wrong

should think with your brain and not your heart although you don't like us a lot of your speccies wrote us off but i'm not so sure they were thinking with a rugby brain either more the case of what they hoped for

Spooky guess !!!

i think with the form of both teams throughout the season and recent form it was fair to anticipate a Giants win. But they didn't turn up on the day, alot of the youngsters froze, Robinson, Brown etc. Experience showed. Congrats on your win, the best team won and the first half was really enjoyable if a little flat in the second. I was sat in the Huddersfield end and could only hear the Wire fans which was a shame but you really got behind your team. Interesting article in League weekly this morning about the video ref for the game bentham. Isn't he from warrington. strange selection. The article questions some of the 50/50 decisions on the disallowed Huddersfield tries. Wondered what your thoughts on those decisions were. Not suggesting it woulf have changed the outcome, it wouldn't, but would habe made it a closer game.

Great site lads.

I love all these Wire fans coming on here all giddy, it's just like having a 40 year old mate who's been a virgin all his life coming round your house screaming 'I've finally had a shag'...!!!!

But how gutted would you be when you realised that he'd actually just had one and you hadn't had a shag for 6 years. Then the realisation would also set in that your 40 year old mate was going to have numerous fantastic shags over the next few years whilst you would have to make do with lonely nights in the company of Madame Palm and her 5 lovely daughters.

Haha....don't get illusions of grandeur..!!

Cant belive it ..............



I ve finally had a shag........

About bloody time too..!!

watched it again the double movement i thought was rite i paused it frame by frame our disallowed was right 2 men in the tackle in fairness the other possibly should have stood

I called the double movement at the time. His momentum, was stopped a fraction of a second before he put the ball over the line. I thought the obstruction one should have stood though.