Are you saying it wasn't even a penalty then?

And your post just shows you up for the person you are: The extermination of the Jews was over 39 years ago, and it's hardly the sort of thing to bring up on this forum is it? As you are quite obviously not Jewish, and none of your family was exterminated you seem to think you can get a cheap shot in about the extermination.
Can I suggest that you pay a visit to Auschwitz and see for yourself just why people get 'pent up about the extermination of the Jews'. Then you might realise that it's not really an appropriate sort of thing to bring up on a RFL forum in an effort to score cheap points.

no...but nothing more, people saying ban, burn him string him up

39 years ago was it, no wonder you lot overspend on the salary cap with a mathmatical genius like yourself, you are the Goon warriors Treasurer and i claim my £5

he said over 39 years ago

You are a dick wipe who can't understand simple comprehension, and I claim my £5.

Where?????

I think you will find, as has been stated previously, that the issue is YOUR fans accusing Sam of diving, as apparently there was "nothing in it"!

Quote ="tigerman1+1"39 years ago was it, no wonder you lot overspend on the salary cap with a mathmatical genius like yourself, you are the Goon warriors Treasurer and i claim my £5'" You see the confusion you cause by using poorly structured sentences? It may have been better to talk about the high tackle 39 years ago in one statement and then the extermination of the Jews in the next. Personally I was quite impressed by the invocation of Godwin’s Law in you first post on the topic and in only the second page, well done at descending to this so quickly. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin%27s_law

Quote ="tigerman1+1"39 years ago was it, no wonder you lot overspend on the salary cap with a mathmatical genius like yourself, you are the Goon warriors Treasurer and i claim my £5'" You see the confusion you cause by using poorly structured sentences? It may have been better to talk about the high tackle 39 years ago in one statement and then the extermination of the Jews in the next. Personally I was quite impressed by the invocation of Godwin’s Law in you first post on the topic and in only the second page, well done at descending to this so quickly. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin%27s_law

This pointless and irrelevant reference to the holocaust is DEEPLY OFFENSIVE. Why bring genocide into a debate about a rugby match?

Mods please ban this poster NOW.

MY fans?

You do know im a Wiganer dont you. It does say in location, no wonder people take the sometimes with gumps like you representing us.

The intent was there so how can it be nothing

He is Nick Griffin, and I claim my £10.

Still can't believe what I just read to be honest.

On the Tomkins matter, nothing in it for me, a ban would be extremely harsh for something like that. I thought the McGouldrick challenge after the try was worse.

That was a nasty one too.

It's sad but predictable that players like Sam, who are talented but [usmall[/u always seem to bring out the cheapshot merchants.

Thank you Pedro, I mean only Wigan fans live in Wigan, and no one who supports Wigan lives anywhere else!!

I guess I didn't live in Birmingham for 6 years and support Wigan then, oh no siree, and you know what my location said at the time - BIRMINGHAM!!!

And learn to read a thread - how many of US Wigan fans were calling for a ban?????

You are ok and I hope you stand corrected. Most fans at the start were moaning about it and calling for sending off and bans.

Dont blame me because you lived in Birmingham wasnt my fault, not many rugby fans in Wigan support other teams so get off your high horse and stop being angry at the world.

Don't you just hate Bolshy Newbies?

No - they're youngicon_wink.gif

They'll learn



Although if they think this demonstartes "anger at the world" then it might just be a long painful process

Incorrect again

Not necessarily - I was talking about maturity not age!

ah so immature not young then, well done

RL is a tough sport, unfortunately Sam will have to take a few of them throughout his career.

IMO he has the bottle to do so.

Unfortunately then, he might look like Sean Edwards in later years.

Apparently, Edwards is very angry at the state of his looks, from his time in the game.

Edwards was ugly at 17 though

I'm no expert on the visual beauty on anyone's face, but I suspect that Sam does not rate highly in the beauty stakes even at his tender age. I can't see him improving his looks as he gets older either.