Now that you`ve signed Gleeson....... does that mean that Phelps is on his way to Leigh (serious question), its been a big rumour in Leigh for a few weeks now?

in answer to all your questions there, no.

Not a clue tbh but it would seem a move that would suit all parties.

He's a decent player at superleague level but probably not quite good enough to hold down a regular position in our backline.

He'd be a top player at NL standard.

No, not upto now.

Thanks for that lads.

Has 3 months changed any of your comments?

Would you expect them to have?

not really no

Regards Mathers.
I don't think Warrington fans expected him to turn out like he has. He never lacked enthusiasm for Wigan and I only wished that that had rubbed off on a few of his colleagues. He certainly seems a different player in a Warrington shirt and I'm genuinely glad for him. Hopefully he can continue in this form and put some competition in for the GB fullback position. I only wish he'd played like that when he was with us. I'm not sure of the reasons why he seems better for Warrington. Coach, leass pressure, team style of play, I don't know but good luck to him.

Regards Gleeson.
We needed a right centre badly. He's the best British right centre. He's shown signs of good play for us but he's not done it often enough as yet. I think this is due to the lack of ball he gets and hopefully he'll see more of the ball now Hock's gone from the left side.

All in all a good deal for both clubs. Whether Gleeson was worth the money that changed hands I don't know and frankly I don't care, it wasn't my money

Agree with all you say... think that is an end to the Mathers/Gleeson thing!

in fairness to wigan, hock is/was a hell of a lot more creative than gleeson anyway so you can understand the play going down that side

hopefully, as you say, gleeson will be more prominent from now on