That would be me.

It's easy to rewrite history, especially after such a low point under our last fraud of a coach, but let's not make out that Wane was some kind of Bellamy super coach.

I've discussed this plenty of times before and admitted that I enjoyed the success he brought us, but there was also a lot that wasn't right too. Ultimately, a coach is there to win trophies and Wane was excellent at that, but for all his talk about "standards", I've seen plenty of regular season games under Wane i.e not one off matches, where it looked like the lads simply couldn't be d. You'd then get almost Lam levels of "training will be hard this week" comments etc.

Personally, I hope Peet brings that week to week consistency that Wane didn't really have.

Do you think Peet will really be in charge of the team or do you thing it will be Wane doing it all…?

The fact that anybody is even thinking about it Is not a great position for an incoming coach to be in with a previous (and successful) coach breathing over your shoulder.

But having said all that I think Wane will bring a short-term improvement immediately but the playing personnel aren’t good enough to challenge for trophies IMHO…. I still see you in the top 4 though, there’s definitely at least 6 teams worse than you.






Not like you to be obsessed with St Helens. You seem to spend more time over there than a lot of their fans, and what kind of grown man has a sig like yours?

He’ll demand that by shouting at them a lot

he didnt come across as a shouter more a straight talker

I can imagine he’s so wound up about St Helens success since he left that he can’t NOT shout at anything…..

At least you know he won’t nearly cry in front of the cameras like Lam did.

You can't re-write history!

Well said Juke. Waney epitomises what the club should be all about.

It's a well known fact that during the Maguire years that despite first impressions SW had a calming but focused effect on the players in the dressing room. Yet the publicly calm Maguire was the one giving the players the hairdryer treatment behind the scenes if things weren't going their way.

Well you can certainly change how you perceive it.

Many posters on here are quick to jump on others when they talk about the 80's & 90's at Wigan. Phrases like "rose tinted" are banded about to (rightly) remind people that it was rarely as black and white as they remember it being. But if you read the comments on here, Wane has suddenly developed into some kinda super Churchillian coach. He isn't and never was.

A lot of people, myself included, were happy to see him move on. I'm now ok to see him back, but I hope his new remit is one that plays to his strengths and that the management of the side is firmly left to others.

There’s no denying it wasn’t perfect at times under Wane but you always had confidence things would be right when it mattered the most. If a guy with an Aussie accent achieved what Wane did at Wigan, under the circumstances he faced (constantly losing players), he’d be described as a genius. You get people like the guy on this thread (Rankin) who hear his accent and go ‘he just shouts at people’ and label him as a one trick pony of being a motivator only and I find it hugely disrespectful.

I could trawl back through posts of mine over the years and there were times I lost my nerve and called for a change under Wane but I was wrong. When reading Rob Burrows book recently it really hit home that we’re in a comp where things don’t have to be perfect for 95% of the season, as long as you get that other 5% nailed. To nail that 5% you need the right culture, the right mentality in place and you need the right characters. I’m not sure we’ve got the right characters currently but I do know that Wane will ensure we get the wrong ones out and hopefully the right ones in over time.

aye

very well said

I'll happily admit that I don't want that, or at least I don't want it long term.

I'll take a trophy as it's been too long, but long term I want to see a consistent, min level of performance from rnd.1 to GF.

I've said it before, the club reached a good place during 2 seasons under Madge & that's what I want under Peet. I'd take the burnout the end of it because we won our share of silverware and played at a consistent level through that period. You knew what you'd get on a Friday night under Madge - I never felt that under Wane.

Of course you strive for more and in some seasons Wigan and Leeds in that period from 2005-2018 would not just nail the end but they’d nail the regular season as well but if you know you have that up your sleeve and if other teams know you do, it’s always keeping you in the fight.

Ideally you want to be like Saints these past few seasons but those Wigan and Leeds teams weren’t playing in such a weak competition as Saints have been these past few years.

It's a proper downer that he's back

Interesting observation from yourself. Ive seen you on here many times and always thought you were a WUM, and a poor one. It's funny, you wander around RL fans masquerading as a Hull FC fan but over 90% of your 60 posts have happened on here or the Warrington board. So who is obsessed? I don't think you are a Hull fan. You are a Saints fan who dips in and out of our and Warrington's board.

OUTED son. Off you pop.

My favourite part of the interview

Another name for Steph, Lebron, Wolve69 etc
And if he thinks Wane is just a shouter he should just ask Jonny Lomax.

I’m none of those people.I also don’t think Wane is just a shouter, it’s a stereotype that he likes to play up to. Having met him I find him very observant and quite shrewd

Anyway, Who over the age of 12 years old would have a sig like yours? You really are a crank.







Hmmm the plot thickens. I don’t remember ever saying I was a Hull fan ever? Because I’m not a Hull fan at all nor have I masqueraded as one.

I rarely post on RL fans at all because most of the tripe is inane, but this thread is interesting hence posting (I’ve seen so many people, not just on here, who couldn’t wait for Wane to leave and now treat him like the Second Coming)

There’s a genuine hope that Wigan will improve next season, by ANY fan of the game regardless of whom they follow because no-one wants a race to the bottom. If the “best” team can beat the “second best team” easily, they will no longer need to play at their best, and that’s a worry.

The comp needs a challenge, a strong St Helens, Leeds, Wigan and Wire (plus maybe Catalans again?) vying for trophies.

BTW when you say “Off you pop” and “Son” it’s really quite condescending as I’ve been watching the game for 40 years, and put my money where my mouth is spending tots of money at Central Park and the DW over the years. My love of the game is love of The Game.

I agree that the game needs to strengthen back to where we were. I always think back to those Easter weekends back in the early to mid 00's:

Easter Thursday - Bradford v Leeds at Odsal - 22k+

Good Friday Lunchtime - Wigan v Saints at DW - 24k+

Good Friday 3pm - Hull FC v Hull KR - 22k+

All close hard fought games in front of full houses.

It's a fair comment, but then Madge's team was full of excellent players at the peak of their powers. The most impressive part of Wane's tenure was the way in which he kept delivering success whilst having to replace an unbelievably talented squad with, on the whole, young players and lesser replacements. Sadly that meant not really having the resources to be gunning it every friday from February to October.

Funnily enough I always thought the best rugby we've played week-on-week was in Wane's first season which ended in two semi-final defeats when the chips were down. In the years since I gave Wane a bit of a free pass for his 'getting us ready for the business end' approach because I saw it as a response to getting his fingers burned in his first year (and, ultimately, Wigan coaches are judged on the trophies they win). In retrospect, with declining attendances, maybe this was a bit short-sighted, so hopefully Peet can find a better balance this year.

Hard to believe we didn't win a major trophy in 2012 - we were ripping teams to shreds most week. Sam Tomkins was at the centre of both of those semi-final defeats against Leeds - in the cup he seemed to have a meltdown for 20 minutes and cost us 3 tries and in the playoff his injury led to the costly decision by Wane to start Jack Murphy (one of the worst selection decisions I can remember alongside the Endacott 2000 GF reshuffle).

Hahahaha. Tickled me this.

I personally love Wane and his passion for the club, as others have said if you listen to these podcasts it shows him in a different light and he’s a workaholic who leaves no stone unturned.
That said we didn’t play great rugby under him a lot of the time and for people expecting Byrne to turn into a monster I can’t remember a prop ever pulling up trees with Wane, he just wants them to hit the deck and play the ball quickly, he ideally wants smaller mobile props. I also worry about the dynamics with him either not being the main man of possibly Peet becoming his puppet.

I think the thing with Byrne though is not to expect Alex Walmsley but can we expect more intensity in everything he does? Absolutely.

That can come in many forms, it could be the intensity of his carries, so is he charging it in full tilt and making as much ground as he can before he finds his front? Is he putting the maximum effort in to running off the ball? So is he charging through the line, even when the plan isn’t for him to get the ball, so he makes room for others? (A huge issue for the side in general under Lam) Is he trying to smash people in defence and trying to inspire others by making repeat tackles?

That isn’t just aimed at Byrne and in fairness he does some of that at times but he along with Havard IMO need to find a consistently higher intensity to their games to kick on to that next level. The basics are all there for them to take the next steps.