Following that idea, has Farrell ever played there?

looking at it long term, Farrell or Tuson should looking to replace lockers at loose as he is 30 now ( hope he can go another 5 years tbh) as that is also a pivotable position

I think Farrell is the natural choice to replace Lockers when he decides to leave/retire, cracking little player

People seem to automatically think that because they play in the NRL that they're automatically better. Its not true. Many of those centres and props in the list would not make it at a side around 6th or 7th never mind us

Ah Van is a beast

A hippo is a beast as well but still wouldn't get in a wigan team.....lol

It would be hilarious if PAV did come here, and play well....

Only when Satan starts skating to work............

I agree, I said that a few years ago same with Farrell, whichever one suits the hooker role better plays there, look at Terry Newton as he was a second row until Bell turned him into a hooker.

you only said that because I am dislexic....... and I don't fancy Licky Licky on my shirt

Wouldn't that be great

Jonathan wright an cheyse blairs, two big athletic centres. Both aren't realistic targets unfortunately.

a number 6 who can kick is a must for this year.

I can see the point about Fielden more than likely leaving but at the same time he hasn't exactly been missed so far and all the props will have gained another years experience.

Hooker we have Logan, although I would be worried if MM was to be injured for any period of time but at the same time it could either make or break him.

If we recruit another back row forward both IL and SW need to be shot.

Wingers and full back plenty of cover there. Only a centre is needed but I wouldn't put that as a priorty now as we now have Thornley and possibly Gelling in them positions but also wasn't Charnley a in the academy days?