I tell you what Matty I've got to admire your camera work lad. Last second winner against the auld enemy and you had the composure to knock a photo like that off. Great timing mate.

Not silly at all. Despite Tomkins playing in the centre he's still a better SR than H. Stick to the original point-Faz is better than H thus meaning he should be awarded more game time.

Jimmy, not my camera work I'm afraid. (Ripped it off the Facebook site

)

No way was I that composed to have been able to take the picture

Recently signed a five year deal with us.

It's a photo of a tv screen

I bet uncle Andy was chuffed to bits when he saw Liam go over



"Farrell wins it for Wigan!!!" would make an excellent flag if we need any more

That's two games at the DW/JJB where a Farrell has won an important match in the dying seconds. (Andy converting the Renouf to Radlinski try against Bradford from the touchline).

Brilliant stuff.

Farrell and Hansen two great players different aspects to their games, Hansen more impact in the tackle Farrell more likely to break through, but remeber the Hansen try against Leeds last year. If anyone will struggle to get in the team at the moment it is Hock

hock will play prop as is already been said i think anyone in front line will be at risk when hes back because preccys form died down abit and coleys not firing on all cylinders limas well
id only defo keep mossop due too playin well and pure potential

More impact in the tackle? Rubbish. What a bizarre comment. Next ill be reading 'tackle impact stats'. 'Percentage of power impact ratio per tackle' or some other Billy locks.

Does impact in a tackle not make any difference, do you drive a player back by standing still or dropping round their legs. Impact makes no difference whatsoever! RL is known for the impact of the collisions maybe you are talking booolax. Or just showing your lack of knowledge

Ok font of all knowledge, how do you know H has more tackle impact than Faz? This is obserd.

Are you also trying to suggest that the other backrowersdont do any work in def?

couldnt tell from the east stand exactly how he got over......but watching the replay today his moving through the gap was awesome.
spun through like an american footy running back............lads going to be best in superleague if he keeps progressing.

End of the day no ones calling Faz or H apart you think H is no were near standard has the rest of the backrowers which is utter crap faz is going to be a star Hansen deserves his shirt , And again you can NOT compare him to Hock whos not played for 2 yrs

Sorry folks but I still think Farrell is better off the bench at present.
His speed and footwork against slowing opposition forwards is a real asset. That wouldn't happen if he started.
The most vulnerable player if Hock were to hit form is Lima.
Fielden will play as will Prescott and Mossop, the other spot surely is between Lima and Hock.
There are injuries too which will impact on this.

I agree. I would keep the team similar to how it is now as much as we can to get some momentum going. Weve had a lot of swapping and changing which cant always be helped but it has disrupted us a bit. Obviously Fielden comes back in when fit but until then if we can keep the team similar to what we have now we will be going in the right direction.

I agree and at the end of the day like i keep saying to your not a sub no more its a 17 man squad and 17 man effort and the impact he has of the bench at the minute is frightening

Jesus you're slow. Let me break it down for you.
Do I think Faz is better than H? Yes. Do I think Hock was better than H and will be when he returns? Yes.
Do I think H is worst than Tomkins Lockers Hoffman Hock and Faz? Yes.
Do I think Faz deserves more minutes than H? Yes, because he offers more of an attacking threat and can defend just as well if not better.
If Hock returns as a SR H surely will miss out, he's not a patch on Hoffman, Lockers, Hock or Faz.

I'm betting you relate to the theory 'well he doesn't do anything wrong and he works hard so he's earned his place'
Come back when you can back up your comments.

To be honest I got board of your comments and utter crap you was writing I got lost were we was upto you wrote that much Sh*te

What was the question

They're cousins

Go back and read it like a normal person. Yeah total crap rating Faz as better than H.

PS I love the name, anyone with '69' in their name must be a sexual dynamo.

You know what i meant

I have never ever said in this thread about rating them , it's you who's virtually said that H is know were near up to standards of all the rest including Hock even tho no 1 has seen him play for 2 years

P.s