Ok, so back to all things great about Wigan and anything said against them results in being called names.

I didn't think a coward like you who throws insults from behind a keyboard would accept my apology.

Ban me? What for? As if I'd be d

Guys come on banter is banter, drop it, tomorrows another day.

Well you are hardly setting a good example with your behaviour and language on this forum.

"Please accept my apology, I am sorry"
"I don't accept your apology"
Ah well, back to insulting him then

runt a term introduced by you about a Wigan player, then used against a child not involved in the conversation.

As I said st pete reverting to type as usual.

And no i will not accept an apology from someone who calls my son.

I won't insult your son, i bet he's smarter than both of you

agreed!

8 pages of yawn.

Oh well. Never mind. I tried.

Why ate you do offended about me calling Tomkins a runt?

I bet he is.

The irony of this thread is superb. A thread about the poor conduct of Sam Tomkins thoroughly backed by a poster whose conduct, in insulting other posters, is less than perfect.

Lock it and bin it.

Well first off you know damn well I didn't tell you to F*ck off and putting "or whatever you said" in brackets doesn't diguise that fact. If you were so offended that you saw fit to call me "s*ithead" I would, not unreasonably, presume you would know exactly what it was I said that offended you so much. Giving out personal insults may well not be your style, but it most certainly has been tonight. As I said earlier, I think you've made a fool of yourself tonight but I'm prepared to put it down to beer/being gutted that Wigan won. However it's your call, because at the moment you seem to be trying to excuse your name-calling, in which case I can only assume you either a: meant it or b: are embarrassed by it but rather than just apologise you think the best way to cover your embarrasment is to try and justify it (badly, may I add). Like I say...not my experience of you in the past but certainly becoming my experience of you off tonight's performance.

Wow this thread's really kicked off since I left it to watch the highlight's on Sky, which I must say are excellent. Lot's of alternative angles of the try's scored, that weren't shown on the BBC coverage.

Sadly the 15 minutes of build up by the BBC were sh*te! Anyone know what the red button stuff was like?

But he does get boo'ed at the DW already.

just like Mcguire on international duty then

No. He got cheered at for his removal, mainly for his gash defence.

Bit like today really.

I agree he shouldn't have done it. Simply no need. however, just to pick you up on one point, it has been done to us only last season by Mathers and we didn't like it much either. However, if I remember rightly, nothing was done in that instance (or other similar instances by other players) so why do people think it will/should be in this case? Is that double standards? I think the proper course of action would be to fine the players who do this sort of thing, but by that, I mean ALL players, not just selected ones because they're opposition fans pantomime villains .

Aye. Joel scored a cracking try, but any other Leeds play would have tackled him IMO.

He made an equally awful attempt at tackling Charnley too when he scored his try.

How can boo'ing an International be defended??? even your own teams players stuck up for Sam..Yet hes still a rat or a runt....

I think Sam could do with a mentor from another team, some one like,...... Ryan Bailey or Sean Long or maybe the Jammer Graham that goes out to St Helens on a saturday night thinking he's gods gift to scousers.
Good lad Sam, I take it every time Sam scores from now on we will all be giving the fingers to him?








Maybe Sam should start betting on Wigan to lose....


That will give rugby a good name

Embarrassing thread (Started by Wakeys thickest RL fan to be fair ...)

He put 2 fingers up, he didn't shoot someones granny.

Must admit, I reckon Pete is spot on with his description of Tomkins Junior as a runt. He's got that weedy too close together eyes look to go with his snide tactics.

His v sign was simply him displaying his ignorance, and if he continues with it will maybe result in some ed up fan coming onto the pitch. I'm sure that in the remaining matches the opposing players will be eager to point out the error of his chavy ways....