lets be realistic this whole gleason thread is a joke. we been here before with so many names that were dead certs. the fact is people who are so called in the know. in fact know sod all .....

I couldn't care if he plays in the match against York TBH as long as he is here for the Saints game.

In my opinion one of the potential key reasons for us not getting gleeson could be Lenegan's desire to keep Goulding.

This has nothing to do with the fact that he is a good player (because it would be difficult for him to claim that as we currently have bailey in his position) but it could be linked with the fans forum from last year.

Lenegan claimed he was not going to get rid of young players - but in this case surely he has to?? Gleeon compared to goulding is a no brainer

Come on Lenegan - common sense

All this is of course with no inside info

"Gerroff"!!

Be fair, the majority of these posts have been made tongue firmly in cheek.

Remember Billy McGinty? Absolute nobody at Warrington. Went to Wigan became a world-beater and a GB star.

Does that say anything about Wigan and Warrington as clubs?

No.

Neither did your statement.

As anyone thought....... Does Gleeson want to come to Wigan?

Yes we have.
And yes he does.

Yes, as long as it's not on an overblown contract.

Cadoo you see to be in the ''know'' share this with the rest of us again is he really going to sign or are you just making it up?

Fair enough you need to take 99% of whats on here as a joke. But now for people to now an turn round as say the they had been made with tongue in cheek is rather a cop out.

Ah I get it, by saying Monday or Tuesday there is around a 30% chance you could be right, as you have not committed to what Monday or Tuesday and what Week, Month, Year, Decade or even Century so well done.





Face it Would you take a step down to play for Pies?

Its a step up as lets be honest were crap but your a lot worse.

Lets agree to differ, I just think it must be very strange and off putting for both teams during the build up to the Cup games. Your lucky, at least we will be in the draw for the next round. He He He He

[urlhttp://www.guardian.co.uk/sport/2009/apr/03/wiganwarriors-warrington[/url

Is the average age of this chat site 5?

For god sakes be patient. He will play for Wigan. Keep your knickers on ladies.

How many times has that been said in the last week

And you're point is? Just cos he's not signed yet means it's all off?

But the longer it goes on the less likely it becomes.

This is beyond belief.

If you read my earlier post Andy Wilson is saying he may be omitted from the Wire team.

If they want cash not players the hold up will be offloading Mathers to some unsuspecting club and this will take time.

As a friend pointed out to me.
Why would Wire sell him to us prior to the Cup game?
If Gleeson plays for Wire v York then if he does sign he can't play in the C Cup for us as he's already played for Wire.
We may face each other perhaps and the last thing the Wire BOD would want is their former player to score the winning try.
Sign after Sunday and that's one comp he can't play in against them.
As I said, not my thoughts but a friend of mine.

Ah well.

I've reached the point where I'm calling bullshït on this whole rumour.

If he signs - good.
If he doesn't - Well done to the guys that started the wind-up

It's dragged on so long that I have genuinely lost interest now

And as for the "fact" that it must be true because it's in the national press - We all know that this site constitutes at least half of their research.

Does anyone remember either the News of the World and The Observer proclaiming a few years ago that Liverpool were signing a French international named Didier Baptiste ????

The only problem is that "Didier Baptiste" played for Harchester United - A fictional club from the Sky One TV show "Dream Team"

He would fit in well at Analfield then

Says who? You?