[url=http://www.therfl.co.uk/disciplinary/item?2844Could work out perfectly for Hock, although Farrell should play if fit[/url

Rather ironic that it's Wilkin...

RFL Conspiracy to try and make us play Hock to increase the crowd?

I've just had a look at the Sky+ recording, I can't see anything in that tackle at all. It's just before half time and Wilkin never even looks to the referee.

Tuson hasn't been impressing me recently anyway. Farrell gets through much more work and Hock would have a much bigger impact in attack IMO.

I'm staggered and baffled at that one. It occurs with the clock on 39:16 if anyone wants a look back.

Just got round to watching it. Can't believe he is up for that.

Case closed.

Mmmm the only thing anywhere near "dangerous contact" is the fact Chris wraps his legs around Wilkin's in the tackle. Other than that ????????????????????????/

i've just watched this incident and i must admit that the rfl disciplinary are a complete and utter joke. every week you see worse and nothing happens, these people would be better off running children's parties in MacDonald's.

Agree totally - it seems like a pretty innocuous challenge to me. There is certainly no malice intended and he obviously doesn't hurt Wilkin - otherwise he would have complained to the referee.

TBH there was a tackle by 3 Wigan players ( Carmont and 2 others?) quite late in the game about 10 yards from the Saints line which might have been deemed to be dangerous/a spear tackle. His legs certainly got lifted above the horizontal. I was worried that they might have been cited for this.

It beggars belief the number of "bad/late/high challenges" in the past couple of seasons which have often resulted in players being injured that don't get cited, particularly if they are Leeds ( Peacock, Senior, Bailey) or Warrington players ( Morley, Carvell).

It's no great loss if Tuson does get a ban - Faz or Hock are surely pencilled in anyway for Friday

I looked at it as well and didn't see anything so I looked at the beginning of the second half and drew a blank there as well.

i think it does still matter though cause he has being putting in a lot of work in the last few weeks and if u watch the games bk u will notice that

its a shame and i dont understand what he has done... if raynor only got two matches for what he did to sam then i dont see what tuson cud get banned for

well if he does get a ban, then it should be appealed based on the comments made by IL or MM at the start of the season regarding consistency!

But, when core of the apple is rotten, you're going to get bad a fruit right through...

Just before Deacon kicks to the corner.... one of the saints players puts pressue on the leg in the tackle. Think its Magennis. Just as bad if not worse than what Tuson did. It's exactly the same as Lima has done in the past as well. Why is he not up before the beak?

The worst tackle in the whole game was Wilkin on Charnley. Right round the chops.

Charnley even holds his jaw after it

I wonder if Wilkins complianed to the ref at half time about the challenge, but whatchallenge!!!

1 game ban + £300 fine according to his twitter.

Just read it on sporting life. 1 game ban confirmed.

Hock now seems a certainty although I am a huge Liam Farrell fan and felt abit sorry for him last week. I wouldn't be surprised to see Prescott given a rest though.

Joke

1 game ban!!

The worst part of all this is that i can hear the pitter, patter of a Saints fans hoofs..........

What a joke, nothing in that tackle.

Is it the tackle on the 39th minute? If so that's a joke! What has he meant to have done?!?!

I can't believe it. I just don't see anything in that tackle to warrant a ban. Unbelievable. Saying that I don't feel he'll be a big loss, we've got more than adequate cover.