Not quite vitriol



To be fair, that was my first thought when we signed Laffranchi, maybe Waterhouse, Perry is hitting 30 soon if not already there (cant be @rsed looking) and now Puletua.

It can work 2 ways, we have an ageing pack that is always injured as it cant stand modern day SL

Or we have an experienced pack, in their prime who can bring on the likes of LMS, Magennis and maybe Chris Hill if his rumoured arrival from Leigh turns out to be true.

I don't think it's to do with the fact that you're losing British players like Eastmond and Graham that bothers anyone, it's just the fact that Saints are having to replace them with Aussies that are towards the end of their careers.

It's not surprisng that you have to do it to try and maintain a quality squad, it's just that some of yours fans are proving themselves to be hypocrites after criticising Wigan so much for it.

Thank you, finally someone who see what i do

If we were starting from a position of 8 overseas players (excluding Harrison Hansen) like Wigan last year, you might have a point.

In case you hadn't noticed, we aren't.

how did i know this thread would have turned into idiots comparing how many overseas players each teams have?

grow up you bunch of boring d!cks

Plenty of criticism from the saints fans when Ashton left us, that 'we should have paid anything to make him stay', lo and behold, the same thing happened with Eastmond, of course the saints fans reaction is totally different; that's actually what people are talking about not so much the amount of overseas players in any squad (obviously some are pointing out that you've taken on 2 more 30+ aussies in it for the pay day.