True, we all know it'll be the same team as next week, but where's the fun in that?

I think everyone agrees that Pryce is a non starter, but for me the choice for the other is between Mossop and Flanagan as I don't think either has enough at this stage in their career to challenge the present incumbents.

A difficult choice. I think Flanagan is potentially the more dangerous going forward and also really gets stuck in defensively. However, I believe he is better out wide and tends to get overpowered in the middle of the park; but in this case I think we will need to really stand up to the Hull KR pack and as we have Sam, Carmont and Gleeson out wide I'd go with Mossop this time, just for his presence rather than ability.

A bit of a negative reason I know, but it's no use having dangerous backs if the forwards are overpowered and I believe that Flanagan's physique is more suited to the backs rather than a forward.

as with most other people on this board I believe it is down to Mosssop and Flanagan. I think flannagan defense is better but think we will benifit more from Mossop size in the of the park ala Leeds. We all went into the big one thinking that leeds pack would dominate and it ended up with us winning and winning up the middle as well. I think this is what it will take on saturday night winning up themiddle and letting the backs make the yards. A slight change I would make is swap Riddell and Mcloram from last week and start with Riddell as I thin Mcl is more impact hooker role

He shouldnt be registered never mind being considered to play for Wigan.

yes, that good he won at wembley o i forgot we beat you in the semi finals