Quote="kirkamania6"They said that Eastmond looked the more dangerous of the 2 when we played on Maundy Thursday and tbh Eastmond did 2 things that match, kicked a goal, kicked a drop goal. Hardly looking dangerous whereas I think even you will agree Sam had a good game.
We're all entitled to our opinions but I thought that one was unfair on Sam
'"
You would lol.
I wasn't overly impressed with Tomkins performance against us that day, considering the amount of possession you had I thought he may have created more. However it was probably his first really big match, which may have had an effect and I wouldn't say he was poor.
Supposedly Eastmond has a big issue with his shoulders which is why Saints do not play him very often. Of the two i would say Eastmond is probably the more devastating runner but Tomkins does have organisational qualities that we have yet to see him do in a first team shirt.
Scott Moore should be in with a very strong chance.
He only turned 21 earlier this year and has been winning MOM awards for Hudds on a pretty regular basis, and has managed to keep a test international hooker in the form of David Faiumu out of that position.
All views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the RLFANS.COM or its subsites.
Whilst every effort is made to ensure that news stories, articles and images are correct, we cannot be held responsible for errors. However, if you feel any material on this website is copyrighted or incorrect in any way please contact us using the link at the top of the page so we can remove it or negotiate copyright permission.
RLFANS.COM, the owners of this website, is not responsible for the content of its sub-sites or posts, please email the author of this sub-site or post if you feel you find an article offensive or of a choice nature that you disagree with.
'"
