Was actually good to see a fairly decent away support, just a shame they get overly rowdy during the game especially after a few beers, maybe its justification for having the standing terrace open for some gamesl.
rosetint, I know its not the point but did you not think of aporoaching the stewards and asking to move to the other end of the stand, I dont know what they are like over that side as I go in opposite stand and virtually sit where I want.
hope you have second thoughts and come back mate, I would email dave hughes and tony k regrards concession pricing

I'd like to echo Micky's sentiments, and with the big support down from 'Ull I think the club should have opened up the terraces. If you were to contact the club it might put them in mind to do so for other teams that bring a big number down with them.

tbh I can't see a problem with being asked for proof of age if you are buying a concession on the day. They would be asking for proof of age so where your pension is paid is pretty irrelevant.

The easy solution is to register for online tickets and buy in advance or take out a membership.

I must be looking really old. No questions, no proof required, no problem at all.

Quote ="tim"That would be a first, he's been one of the worst players this season, penalties, poor kicks from dummy half and just lazy defence.'" However, is this tantamount to saying he shouldn't have been sent off? www.londonbroncosrl.com/news/5312.php

Quote ="tim"That would be a first, he's been one of the worst players this season, penalties, poor kicks from dummy half and just lazy defence.'" However, is this tantamount to saying he shouldn't have been sent off? www.londonbroncosrl.com/news/5312.php

Quote ="BroncOnIon"However, is this tantamount to saying he shouldn't have been sent off? www.londonbroncosrl.com/news/5312.php'" Don't think so. Just saying no further punishment required.

Quote ="BroncOnIon"However, is this tantamount to saying he shouldn't have been sent off? www.londonbroncosrl.com/news/5312.php'" Don't think so. Just saying no further punishment required.

I know what it's saying, but the RFL are not going to argue in public with their own refs are they?

I didn't see the incident so can't express an opinion on it.

If it was a harsh decision it will be brought up in the review.
quite rightly the rfl will always stand by decisions made on the field, the ref makes decisions in seconds, they dont have the time to review the vid play back.
it did hurt us though

Cullen on Sky said he didn't think it warranted a send off. On the "highlights" it did look bad to me but Cullen thought that Lancaster slipped and Moore just reacted to the movement. And the disciplinary panel say "Tackle is high in a grabbing motion. Send off Sufficient." www.therfl.co.uk/the-rfl/disciplinary/item?5414 So, no swinging arm. I think they agree with Cullen.

Cullen on Sky said he didn't think it warranted a send off. On the "highlights" it did look bad to me but Cullen thought that Lancaster slipped and Moore just reacted to the movement. And the disciplinary panel say "Tackle is high in a grabbing motion. Send off Sufficient." www.therfl.co.uk/the-rfl/disciplinary/item?5414 So, no swinging arm. I think they agree with Cullen.

You see tackles like it every game almost. Player sidesteps a bit and the tackler doesn't react in time. I therefore expect Stokes to issue red in almost every game if he is to be consistent.

You mean he will get to ruin - I mean ref another game?? I thought he was just on work experience & failed!

Was it not similar to the sending off at magic?
hey we all complain when the officials take no action, or use the on report as a get out.

In fairness to Stokes I thought a red was warranted at the time. Does look harsh on the highlights though

OK, I'll take this no further - I remember getting involved in a lengthy dispute on here a few years ago about Stokes making what I thought was a bad decision (against us of course) when he was touch judge at The Stoop.