Looks good to me

. Good to see competition for places in the backs for a change too. Bench could do with an extra prop though IMO, maybe instead of Nanyn.

Agree ,you only have to remember him chasing down that player in that game {can't remember which one tut } to stop a try ,oh was it Sheffield away

i thought nash was a prop?

Thanks for the points Mick but I think we need a better attacking and defensive centre. We have players like Martyn Ridyard who can kick goals from all over the park. Adam is my choice.

Nanyn has to play for his 250+ points a season alone !!!

Plonk him on the wing. Deadly with a good distributive Centre and I certainly wouldn't liketo tackle him on a kick return.

To go with his 90% conversion rate, it really is a no brainer !!

i think nanyn should be kept in the team because of his try scoring ability & maybe with some competition for his place his defence & effort might pick up also

He was last season but apparently he has been given the number 13 shirt this season. Doesn't mean he will be playing at Loose but I wouldn't be surprised if he does.

I`m with you on this one snowy, he`s a better option on the wing than a centre IMO.

Nanyn is a bench player for me who can come on with his strength when the oposition is tired and on the back foot.....will run riot doing this.

cant see him being a LF,i think he's to big and slow.
prop forward for me,i think.

prop or second row but never a loose forward

bring a half back in on DC and put robbie paul to LF.

trouble with having a half on DC is that the game in SL is so short of good halves that any decent ones will get 'snatched back' because of that shortage, i'd sooner have a young hooker (OOH Mother) but again thats the same as a half I suppose there are not that many about.

Fred have n`t we got a good young hooker in Anthony Nicholson.

we have in Nicolson but I suppose if we do sign Govin we won't need a dual hooker anyway, Nico can play at 7 as well, I can see Basil going for a 2nd rower and a prop in any case.

Well with Duffy,Paul,Nicholson,Ridyard and possibly Govin that is those positions covered.
I`d go for a centre/winger now that Inglis is available.......He might like Lobby.

Just to get people thinking and to stimulate debate I think Nico could also cover the stand off position if needs be.

What a good idea, a stimulating debate at 2am on a cold November morning, has the milkman not been yet.

No idea I am lactose intolerant and put your heating on.

I`m not old enough to get heating subsidies.........This country only looks after the old,infirm and out of work folk...........

thing is though fred,if they do call him back,robbie can always drop back in there and someone else can go to loose.

big disruptions on team structures though is that, whereas you can cover a non pivot role easier

perhaps your right fred but we do need decent cover in the halves?.

it might have been posted somewhere but do you know if armstrong is to be used as a centre/winger?.

That'll be one of Govin's jobs when he's officially signed for us so that'll mean we'll have- Riddy, Paul, Duffy, Govin & possibly Nicholson too at our disposal

Armstrong is predominately a back and as basil seems to be going with littler as a forward I see Armstrong being utilised as only in the centre threequarters, he seems to play down the left hand attack track which is also where Nannyn plays so that will be interesting in selections.