Quote ="DemonUK"I love this quote
We are a long way off being 2nd let alone 1st in the world
How many countries actually play the game to level worth watching.
'"
Three countries have won the RL world cup. Four have won the RU world cup.
Four nations have made a RL world cup final. Five have made a union final.
All we're missing is a strong South Africa.
Yep, only three nations could win our competition at the moment, but we'll be in the top three nations in a 14-team world cup finals that has qualification tournaments involving another half a dozen nations. Go back 20 years and tell me it was better when the World Cup was - at most - GB, NZ, Oz, France and PNG.
Papering over the cracks? Or pointing to a real success in the growth of our game over the last 2 decades. Depends whether you start with a glass half full or a glass half drained (and sour).
We're not a long way of second, we're not a long way of first. NZ are stronger than they've ever been, and neither Oz or NZ act to develop the world game as we have by splitting GB into four (eg they are very happy to play islanders rather than encouraging the growth of the game in Tonga, Fiji, Samoa and the Cook Islands). But we go into home tests with NZ expecting to win (Four Nations last time around?) and if when we beat Australia it's a turn up but not a shock.
It's not our fault that RL is an unforgiving sport... football shocks happen all the time because you can put 10 men behind the ball and because a lot depends on luck and decisions in a low-scoring sport (ask Newcastle, Sunderland, etc). Union scores can be kept down by killing possession and running down the clock. But in our game a team with a 5% advantage will just keep scoring, so even league games can end up with a 50 point win.