Maybe they were nervous and it took them ages to pee?

Yeah. I didn't say I believed it, just that there was an article on it in there.

[url=http://www.sportinglife.com/rugbyleague/news/story_get.cgi?STORY_NAME=rleague/10/08/28/RUGBYL_Cup_Drugs.htmlLink to article.[/url

He isn't happy because it took Lee 4-5hrs to pee in the cup last time he was tested, and had the same happened again, he would have missed the celebrations

Ooh stage frights a pain.

Maybe he was holding it in until it wears off?

For about 6 weeks then.

Stupid I may be but your certainly not with me, I'm not that Stupid!

This story was in the (paper version of) Sunday Times today also, along with a very complimentary piece about Warrington.

If true and one or even both were to test positive would that mean that Warrington would be stripped of the title/trophy and be made to pay money back or would the RFL deem banning one or both as sufficent punishment?

Please ignore the Wigan idiot above (BBB). We're not all like that. It' happens all the time. Get a copy of Kris Radlinskis book ( a superb read for real rugby league fans). When he won the Harry Sunderland trophy and became the first man to score a hat trick in the final, he was selected for the pee test.
He was so dehydrated he couldn't give the sample and he had to drink litres of water and couldn't get on the coach back to Wigan. It was something like 4 hours before he could give his sample and then get a lift back to join the celebrations.

That's how it works, right or wrong. And again apologies for the Wigan idiot.

you arrogant know it all prick, it was a genuine question.

You got owned by Rogues

What makes you think that one or both would test positive, which was your inference.

Grow up.

Nothing, i simply wanted to know if a player who had helped his team win a final tested positive for drugs would cause the team to have their title stripped away, i should have worded it better but it was in no way an attempt at trolling

to answer your question, no!

did wigan get penalised when hock got tested positive? no.
the ban would be handed to the individual, not sure if he'd lose/ they'd lose their medals tbh.

but Hock never tested positive after helping Wigan win a final/championship/trophy, if he had, would we have had that cup and any money taken away

Stop fishing,you moron.

Nobody's fishing/trolling you remedial knob, it is a genuine question, obviously no one knows the answer as nobody has said anything

Well wouldn't they have to look at all the games in which Hock played and deduct points accordingly, if that was the precedent that was being set ? A league is no different to a cup, it's still a competition.

I can't remember if you won or lost the game when he was found positive but if you won and wigan kept the 2points then there is your answer

3/8 whitworth, thank you

Ahhh, so you know a tool when you see one then eh?

bollox to it, why bother

"Indeed"!!