up the corner?

Personally I'd take the cash which would also free up some space on the salary cap so Smith can get the players in he wants

I would take $1 Zimbabwe for Mathers and pay for his taxi.

So he doesn't want Gleeson then?

If we got mathers then at least we would have a full back we could sort of trust.

(However, it did sound like Riley had a good game yesterday)

Are you still inebriated from the weekend?

PS

I wouldn't trust Mathers as a custodian of a pack of jelly babies in a nursery.

[iAre you still inebriated from the weekend?

PS

I wouldn't trust Mathers as a custodian of a pack of jelly babies in a nursery.[/i

Well said gtmm Mathers was fine as a 17 year old on loan with us but has been poor with Wigan and wouldn't be worth the taxi fare

No, Gleeson doesn't want us.

What a load of codswallop this rumour is.
It isn't even a good entertaining one like the playoff clause one was

Ritchie Mathers at full back?

Jesus, I'd rather have Martin Mathers playing there.

My understanding is Gleeson at Wire til end of season, then off to Oz.

Marshall Mathers would be better too (only if he had Dr. Dre with him though)

Dre to replace Gleeson!

Knock on from King.

Edited.

i was informed about the wigan offer to us re gleeson involving a swap deal with the two players from wigan you mention saturday morning but was told not to post it. apparently wigan want the deal happen asap.

Sticking point though are mathers is injured for 6 weeksish (do we want another injury prone full back??) though have heard that smith quite fancies goulding.

My opinion on gleeson is he has never shown any real interest in playing for us and should go on that basis alone.

York 79

Can i also say that this is an offer driven by Wigan and not us.

York 79

Sorry mate - but don't think much to your opinion

the worrying thing about this is that obviously smith is keen on mathers from his leeds days, he could be a work in progress to build his confidence back up but we've already got enough to be working at here already.

It's not an offer that excites, nor one that would improve warrington at all. Pity it's not like the NBA or other yank sports where you can trade ppl to create salary cap room and then waive peoples contracts.


Perfect world eh(or an american one)

It would be a highly regressive deal.

the guy talks a lot of sense..i for one values his opinion....any how if gleeson does`nt want to be here good riddance

If Reardon was released following his hearing, and Mathers signed on a pay as you play/structured deal as he was at Wigan, then I wouldn't mind it, as I couldn't see how we'd lose out. If Smith can get something out of him - great, if not he's jibbed at the end of the season anyhow.

I'd have an issue, if he was part of any 'packages' or swaps or whatever.

As a shot in the dark, why not.

Pfft. You give love a bad name.

Sigh...


also a silly deal.

It appeard t'Pies are quite giddy at the thought of this going through. It has got me thinking; who would you prefer to take from Wigan's squad? Of the top of my bonce, I can only think of Hock and even then he would have to improve his ball retention/decusion making massively.