Maybe so but would you say a wire fan saying that you'd only take Richards, Tomkins and Hock would be classed the same?

We'd surely get at least an even share.

I suppose a neutral would give the best indication.

As a neutral, I'd rather have Riddell as our food tester than our hooker.

I'm sorry Emma, but i had to stop taking notice after that. The rest aren't too far off though

That's the worst kop out I've ever heard on here

"I pick and choose my inside information"

Not blinkered just delusional .

tbh bar McIlorum who has potential, the other 3 hookers are all shocking at the moment, i just went for Riddell because i dont think people have given him a fair chance yet to settle in, and he is actually playing better at wigan now than Higham ever did.

AS I SAID BEFORE 3 WITH ONE ABOUT EVEN

Not basing Higham on his past performances but Riddell on his current are we my dear?

This would be likie swapping a Ferrari (Martin Gleeson) for 2 run arounds that have failed their MOT and combined wouldn`t add up to much more than a hundred quid.

This is obviously an early April fools as nobody in their right mind would have Mathers or Goulding never mind swap them for Martin Gleeson.

this is why this kind of thing shouldnt be done Ben Harrison if he carries on like he has been, can easily become player of the year at warrington....

I have never heard of Paul Prescott nor seen him play I can only assume you are in the same boat with regards to Ben Harrison....

Quite correct ,maybe they should be touting them to Widnes ,with Cullen and his midas touch he can turn them into wallets or market traders .

Too true.
Goulding could be usefull and Gleesons on his way anyway.
I'd still rather have Gleeson for the rest of this season than swap now tbh, but pleeease stick him back at 3

ok base both on past and i'd still have riddell

Higham -
Good Scooter, Fast over 100m, Has Passion

Cant Pass, Cant Organise, Loses his head when the going gets tough, Loads of Penaltys, Poor Ball Handling, Not Powerfull Enough.

Riddell -
Excellent distribution, Organises round the field well, Powerful close to line, Scoots well but not as good as Higham,

Overweight erm...thats it.

Higham only has one thing to his game, Riddell is the better all round player.

In Goulding I reckon yor getting a reasonable player but Mathers

I'd try to get a decent back-rower from Wigan, maybe Hansen.

Done deal.
Due to be announced on Wednesday.

How long have you been watching Rugby League?

Think what he means is he is crap but we could give him a job with heathcotes serving at the beer kiosk

If you do it that way, i could probably come up with some good stuff on Mathers, means tosh now though.

Try again, but on current form, something Riddell hasn't found yet

[urlhttp://www.superleague.co.uk/statistics_player.php?hs1=2009&hp1=2075&hs2=2009&hp2=374&stat=missed_tackles&season=2009[/url

One trick Mick loses again.

thanks, people criticise riddell because he's overweight and plays for Wigan.

I bet most of the people who do have never seen him play.

Well those stats tend to support that Higham is a better player than Riddell. More tries, try assists, tackles, carries, attacking kicks, runs from dummy half, offloads, tackles from marker, tackle busts.

Cheers for flagging that up.

I noticed that too. With one less game as well, no less.

I am substantially at a lossd as to how he has lost out.

Twice the amount of penalties, twice the errors and less metres.

You're welcome to him.

Don't forget, we had him for three years and that's why we got shut.

He couldn't find a man in a gay brothel.

RG - I direct you to Mark M's post above. That's 3 to Piggy, and 9 to Mickey by our count, and he's played one less match. Yep. Welcome indeed.