I agree with this, that's why I put atkins as winger in my line up too. Big quick and can get over the line just not the best passer. Think he could be our Ryan hall.

Right. everyone stop it now. You're just saying the first things that come into your head now.

Can I change my selection please? I'd like to put Matty Russell at prop, cos he's short and can't catch a high ball. He could be the new Danny Nutley.

Lol

Yes it's your 17

If you cast your mind back, when Atkins arrived, he was winger to King. He carried the number 23 to represent winger/centre I believe.

How do you suggest we get rid of Gidley when he is under contract?

I don't know if this is actually true, but I was told that when Dodds got injured at Catalan this season, he had to stay behind due to the injury and couldn't fly back but had to be driven back by a club rep a few days later. Apparently, en route, there was a car-jacking incident and the two of them were nearly left stranded in the French outback.

So there you have it. Organise a team-bonding exercise in the south of France, rent a mini bus and send Bailey, Dodds (he could navigate, he'd obviously know the way), R.Evans, Penny, Gidley & Atkins off in advance and let our European neighbours criminal fraternity do the rest.

Not only would we free up a huge chunk of the salary cap, we could probably get a nice insurance pay off as well.

1 gidly
2 Lineham
3.watkins
4 Atkins
5 mcgilvray
6 sandow
7 Patton
8 hill
9 Clarke
10 Cooper
11 sims
12 hughes
13 Westerham

Subs
Ratchford
Dodds
Harrison
Westwood

I would also be happy for t king to take Atkins spot if he moves on as rumoured and Cosby. For Harrison or Dodds

Move Patton to hooked to spell Clarke and ratch in the halves

Move Patton to hooker?


Really?


You're suggesting that after this weekend?

I can't believe some of your fans don't rate Ratchford.

In my opinion he is absolute quality and like some mentioned a few pages earlier, one of SLs finest players. I'd have him at Hull FC in a heartbeat. Speaking of which, when we played you guys for the LLS, Ratchford had a great game and I think we would have beaten you had he not been in the team. Just my opinion of course.

Anyway I was hoping you'd have won the GF on Saturday but you were just lacking some go-forward and maybe some game management in the second half. Get a couple of good props and you'll be ok. Also FWIW, I thought you were quite unlucky not to win the CC but obviously no regrets on my behalf

I know that it doesn't fit our negative reaction on here that we've got at the moment Rodney but I agree with you.

Quote ="rubber duckie"If you cast your mind back, when Atkins arrived, he was winger to King. He carried the number 23 to represent winger/centre I believe.'" Has always been at centre . Its King who was on the wing. www.rugbyleagueproject.org/match ... 0tLS0tLQ==

Quote ="rubber duckie"If you cast your mind back, when Atkins arrived, he was winger to King. He carried the number 23 to represent winger/centre I believe.'" Has always been at centre . Its King who was on the wing. www.rugbyleagueproject.org/match ... 0tLS0tLQ==

No I think that we acknowledge his abilities and he is a good player, however not worth shuffling people around to fit him in to the team. He is a luxury player who's wages could be utilised better. Let's not forget for every good game he has he has am anonymous one also and is prone to too many dropped balls because he refuses to carry the ball properly/securely.

In a realistic world (What I think the club could achieve/buy), I'd have:

Gidley
Lineham
T. King
Watkins
Solomona

Patton
Sandow

Hill
Clark
Cooper
Wilde/Jullien (Currie when back from injury obviously)
Hughes
Westerman

Smith/Dwyer
Sims
Crosby
Savelio

Quote ="Builth Wells Wire"Has always been at centre . Its King who was on the wing. www.rugbyleagueproject.org/match ... 0tLS0tLQ=='" more minutes of your life wasted. But your also wrong. They used to switch throughout the game.

Quote ="Builth Wells Wire"Has always been at centre . Its King who was on the wing. www.rugbyleagueproject.org/match ... 0tLS0tLQ=='" more minutes of your life wasted. But your also wrong. They used to switch throughout the game.

Is it not a forum for discussion?

No question about it.

Wigan have "Pacific"
Saints have "Saddened"
I wonder who we have?

I only post on here if your referring to me. Once again your starting to cause shat again.
Why can't you just let it go? It'll make you ill.

For once you are right

Gidley Lineham Watkins Atkins Solomona Patton / Ratchford Sandow Hill Clark Cooper Hughes (Currie when back from injury obviously) Sims / Hughes Westerman Ratchford / Patton Westwood Crosby Tough NRL forward with excellent injury record Someone like Luke Douglas www.bbc.co.uk/sport/rugby-league/37497014

Gidley Lineham Watkins Atkins Solomona Patton / Ratchford Sandow Hill Clark Cooper Hughes (Currie when back from injury obviously) Sims / Hughes Westerman Ratchford / Patton Westwood Crosby Tough NRL forward with excellent injury record Someone like Luke Douglas www.bbc.co.uk/sport/rugby-league/37497014

I wasn't only responding to the Ratchford part but seeing as you asked

"No" "shuffling people around to accommodate him" surely the opposite is true? Russell as a returning FB works if he can make a catch and he can't so we put him out wide. Gidley could play FB but is needed in the middle where we are light. There are shouts for a bench spot so he can spell Clark or get him to put a few pounds on play him as a ball handling 13.

Yes all of this is Ratchford's fault I agree he should stop the one handed stuff but I wish he'd bugger off right now.............back to stand off, or centre would be my ideal IF we had a FB. Johnson might make it, we may buy one, we could have tried a switch with Evans or built Russell's confidence up under a bomb.

I really don't get the lack of respect for Ratchford. The team hasn't been shuffled to accommodate him, it's been the other way round. He should be 6 and Gidley at 1. Being at fab would possibly give Gidley a bit of extra thinking time which would benefit his "game management.
I like Russell and his metre making from full back but there is more to that position now (eg who would you rather defended a high kick at full back?).
I do think Rhys Evans is limited at centre and a specialist winger is also required assuming TS is about to bin Penny off (which is a crying shame ).

Why is Evans limited at centre ? If Warrington more often than not attack to the left, it's going to be hard for him to score playing on the opposite side. He reads the game very well and puts in big defensive efforts. Games are won on defence.

He is limited because he doesn't know what to do with the ball in an attacking position and that is a core skill for a centre, if we can't attack we can't score, it's scoring more than your opponents that actually wins games.

We have off loaded one of the king brothers. And the other one isnt much better