seen courteeners at parr hall. bloody good band. more talent than that oasis crap.

But not an ounce of originality to seperate them from any other second rate, tin-pot British guitar band doing the club circuit....



The problem with a lot of these bands is that they are so musically limited...2 albums in and they become boring because they don't have the talent to do or try anything slightly different.

aye your rite about that oasis . crap they are . when they released as many albums as there simalar sounding band the 'status quo' then they can be classed as gods eh?

Here here Hicksy.

Who on earth said Status Quo didn't sound the same? Everything they've ever done sounds the same. As Thecko once commented: "they've made a very good living from 3 chords"

Seen them a couple of times live and they are very, very good. The only problem they have is their music seems to attract a crowd of morons and it seems to cause problems, possibly the City/United stuff I don't know, but I think that to a degree has ruined peoples opinions on them, Noel is one of the best ever British song writers, along with Morrissey, Lennon etc. Where as Liam is the a[size=9.[/sizersehole, the presence on the stage, a great front man. The argument whether or not they are better than The Roses is a difficult one, The Stone Roses only released two albums, one being brilliant, one being very good. Oasis have released alot of albums containing brilliant songs, but only one or two truely great albums, although I love Oasis' music, I think it was time for a split. Time to let Noel establish himself as a great solo man. They were past it anyway.

Your post was difficult to take seriously from the start, but on reaching this point I just fell about laughing....



The second album was bobbins....