Yes but Saints didn't have 2 players get injured in the early stages of the game.

In the end Warrington had 7 players out Briers, Morley, Hicks, Higham, Grix, Clarke, Rauhihi.

gilmour was injured in first half and faasavalu went off injured as well so cant really say anything.

now take that 7/10 for bridge and stick an asterisk next to it as he's probably trained at right centre all week, only having to step in due to grix' injury, and not really having a hb partner for the second half cept when Vanderson was giving monas a rest at hooker.

we lost two playmaker's last night which totally fecked things up.

Salford had 7 players missing last week and still beat Saints.

We need to face it people!! We're not as good as we think we are!!

That was what I thought. The loss of Long did them a favour.

I've just spent the best part of a hour reading through the threads on here and I cant believe some of the blinkered rubbish I've been reading.

Just a couple of points to take from last nights game.
1/The players missing for both teams last night would'nt have altered the game if they had played.
2/We are still a class apart from st Helens and Leeds.
3/The ref was consistant for both teams-good or bad whichever way you view his performance
4/ St Helens have a play 80 minutes mentality.
5/Kyle Eastmond is potentially the most exciting halfback prospect to come into RL since Andy Gregory.
6/Saints have proven that you dont have to go to the South seas to find talent,ims they had 5 players playing,who had come up through their ranks.

Monaghan? Good Game? Rubbish.

Without reading through the 3 pages, the answer is NO.

1st half decent out of dummy half, after that poor.