No, when i saw it i though he'd be looking at a couple of matches purely as things have changed now.

It was a shoulder straight to the face, Morleys was a shoulder straight to the face.

Neither wrapped arms around, both went for the game changing hit.

Unless someone demonstrates otherwise the only difference is that Ropati was badly injured, Hansen was able to play on.

Because Moz is God!!!!!!

We may think Chase is when he is playing for us ...

wouldnt want him here cutting the grass...well over rated

Hopefully Chase not playing should make my long journey home a good one, the one man team lose their one man and they crumble, see also Saints and Roby.

Think you just answered your own question quite well there, mate.

Anything that results in that level of broken jaw is a bad hit and probably had intent and should be a card.

Simples.

Whats the difference between Susan Boyle and Cheryl Cole???

But that's not true is it.

Yes i am sure the level of injury is taken into account but it does not determine if a tackle is illegal or not.

If injury was the measure of a bad tackle, Keith Senior would have had ten weeks for his tackle on Chev Walker.

Tbh, I couldn't be d going deeply into such a stupid question.

The simple thing is chase intended to do an illegal tackle and the broken jaw proved it, Moz didn't. Forget luke burgess, forget chev walker. The difference between chase and morely was the intent.

Terrible attack - makes you ashamed to be British.

if that had happened on bridge Street then you would want a custodial sentance. What would happen is they get let off with a 100 hours unpaid work so pretty much the same thing has happened here. Wanted 10 games actually got 3

Couldn't be d?

But you could be d giving a snotty, not properly thought out response.

Noted

One you wouldn't be seen dead with, th other you wouldn't kick out of bed!

Well for a start Morley hit Hansen with part Bicep part Pectural part Shoulder, not the forearm / elbow

Chase not only hit Ropati in the jaw, he left the ground and raised the forearm whilst doing so. It's not even in the same category of "tackle".

yes possibly i find it hard to tell to be honest. to me both hit the player in the face.

I think the difference is simply that the interpretation of attacks to the head have changed, and the term reckless has changed so that more of a onus is on the tackler.

I honestly think Morley would be looking at a game or two if he did that this season.

It is certainly getting more difficult to put in a big hit these days, which is a shame but player safety must come first, we certainly don't want injuries like Ropati has suffered.

Never let it be said I'm not a class guy.

=#FF0000[size=150NO SCREEN GRABS FOLKS
HY[/size

I have gone to the effort of highlighting a few differences, including:

Chase hit the head, while moz hit the shoulder
Chase led with the elbow, Moz led with the bicep and shoulder, at the body
Chase lept into the air, Moz maintained his ground.

Clear as day. I can Pm the pic if the mods want rid. Not to be snotty, but they are nowhere near alike.

saved me a job there jd..... the 2 incidents are nothing like being anywhere similar in my eyes.

There's also the probability that the Morley incident will have been reviewed at the time, so why bring it up now?

Great job

Same as my point??Who would you rather get Stink Finger off???
Susan Boyle Or Cheryl Cole??

Remind me...how many games was Chris Bridge banned for when he pleaded guilty to "intentionally striking Bradford half-back Ben Jeffries with the FOREARM".........
It the content of the offence it (IMO) doesnt matter that chase broke the guys jaw...he was still banned for 3 games for the same offence....and oh yeah i just remebered..it was only 1 game that Bridge missed!
Typical Wire hypocrites!!!

Yea really comparable.

Remind us how long Sammut was banned for, for doing the exact same thing against Hull Kr?

Typical Bradford hypocrites!!

this did make me smile, excellent effort.

however...


Chase hit the head, while moz hit the shoulder

nope when you watch in Moz definately connects his shoulder straight in Hansens mush, hence him losing his marbles momentarily.

Chase led with the elbow, Moz led with the bicep and shoulder, at the body

Harder to tell but no Moz smashed his shoulder straight into H face whilst admittedly making other co
tact etc.
Chase' elbow def pops up after contact but initial contact is with the upper arm / bicep.

Chase lept into the air, Moz maintained his ground.
maybe maybe not, but the relevance of this depends on the height of the players etc

still nice try.

All i was trying to point out was that the interpretation of the rules have changed over the last two year...

you have an opinion, voice it on a forum then state (imo)
then call people hypocrites for having an opinion!

well done