What about the last kick of the game, did that mean nothing then.

I am Pig sick, literally, I was going today but I think I have got Swine Flu and I feel quite ill.

Anyway, why are people moaning ? we matched the Grand Final winners of the past two season in their own backyard in a game that mattered so much more to them than us.

WELL DONE LADS, YOU SHOULD BE PROUD OF THE DISPLAY

, AND IF WE PLAY LIKE THAT NEXT WEEK THEN .................perhaps just perhaps we could be on our way to you know where

I was talking from a Warrington/your argument point of view.

I don't think he gets the fact there were other incidents in the game which influenced the result.

i agree with that matey

Yes, but you are saying one kick doesnt matter, which clearly you are wrong, one kick won the game.

Yes, from a Chris Bridge point of view.

Don't try and turn this around now that you have proved to have been wrong.

So you weren't bothered then???




Take a look at your teams reaction at the end,i think you'll see it mattered just as much to both teams.

What about all the kicks Leeds missed? If they had kicked them we would have lost by a greater margin.

I wouldn't bother arguing with him, seems the think that the goals were the ONLY reason why we lost.

Which was NOT the case.

Not been proved wrong, i said if Bridge would have kicked that goal we would not have lost.......would you have put your money on us losing if he had kicked that goal

dont think so.

What money? lol.

So does one kick matter.....yes or no.

It was, did you not see the last kick of the game.

No, as we had another chance at goal just before half time.

Oh wait, it doesn't matter according to you.

You just dont get it do you.

There is no convincing you is there?

As a neutral I'd say the reason you lost the match was because Carvell dropped the ball. Had that not happened, I think you would have held on.

The reason Leeds got so close to you is you gave away too many penalties at one point in the game and at another point in the game you had a spell like we did on friday night when the opposition ran all over you for a while. Again, had those things not happened, you would have won.

What's not to get?

We had a penalty underneath the posts, 2 minutes before half time and decided to tap rather than going for the 2.

To me, THAT and a few other decisions were the reasons why we lost and not the last minute try and conversion by Leeds.

In the first argument you provided, no..........but then when you were proved wrong, you changed your argument just to try and get a yes answer.

First post.

Did you or did you not say 1 kick doesnt matter, when Leeds won the game with one kick, you cant have it both ways. The difference in the end was we missed a simple kick near the end, and Leeds kicked a great goal.

Wire fans bickering.........Now theres a shock..

Was it not smith who took the kicking duties off hicks...

All these IFs and BUTs. I believe it was stupid not to take the two points just before half time, but to say that that decision ultimately cost us the game is very naive.

Had we taken those two points, then the second half would have played out completely different. But assuming the hyperthetical second half proceeded as the real one did (which I doubt), we would have been 20-18 up and chances are would have played the percentages and kicked into the in goal rather than run for Coopers try. Maybe we would have scored from the kick, or maybe force a dropout, or maybe Scott Donald would have scooped the ball up and ran 100m with it to score.

The only IF that makes the slightest difference was IF Sinfield missed the last kick we would have drawn, as it was he didn't.

Better (but only slightly) team won, yet despite the defeat, and rightly or wrongly, I am far more confident tonight about next week than I was this afternoon.