Don't get me wrong, It'll be bad if both are banned, but in the scheme of things, i'm not too bothered. If we have to take on Wigan with two recognised props, well, we're up against it, I'd move Louis to prop, and I'd tell him to stop thinking he has ball skills, we don't want to see them. I'd remind him that his most effective game last season was Wigan at the HJ, when he ran straight, hard lines, and was an aggresive menace all night.

Getting back the Morley & Carvell thing, yeah it's sad if they get banned, but given their previous for injuries etc, it could be worse. You could be talking on this thread about missing them for weeks & months, season over before it's started etc, losing them for a week or two, well, it's just a bit annoying, that's all.

I have resigned myself to the fact they will both be banned anything different will then be a massive bonus.

Exactly what i was thinking. Great minds and all that.

Good call that

Morley should get banned Carvell shouldnt

I think its odds on that both will be banned for the wigan game.

Now they've been cited i think they'll both get a ban. Just makes victory over Wigan that more sweeter beating them with the 2nd string

Looking at previous hearings involving Gaz and Moz.

Carvell 9 hearings no bans.
Moz 15 hearings 2 bans.

Looking at that you'd imagine we'll be very unlucky to have both bannned for the weekends game.

I also doubt that the Rfl will have the kahuna's to ban both our starting props ahead of such a big game, (maybe wishful thinking).

If both are banned then Moving Harrison from Loose would be our best bet and give Grix a game at 13.

Same, but I am a pessimist anyway.

I reckon the decision will tell us whether the Wigan Mafia have taken control of the RFL again.

How do you work that out?

I would say the opposite.

Silly boy

I just hope Smith and Co drag up every case over the past two years of similar charges and tackles. Hopefully finding one that or two that were worse and went unpunished.

Wasn't Hame Lukaki's a forearm/elbow on Leon Pryce the same as Carvell's?

Saying that, Jackson was stooping into the tackle on Carvell when contact was made, where as Pryce was stood upright and is 6'4 and copped it straight in the face from what looked like the same fend as Carvell.

Looking at the game and the views of other posters I think Carvell will receive a one game ban and Mozza will get away with a warning. I'm basing this upon the fact that Carvell appeared to make a movement towards the Castleford player, however with Moz the contact was exaggerated by the fact that Sherwin appeared to inadvertently/accidently duck into the tackle.

I'm not condoning any of the actions of the players, however I believe that the RFL might take a look at each case with an eye on the game at the weekend which could be a great advert for rugby league - SL 15 has, so far, been blessed with great games and great attendences and I believe the RFL will not want to throw a spanner in the works of a local derby with 2 unbeaten teams in front of a sell out crowd (and on Sky). Banning both players would blunt the Wolves and possibly dull what is going to be a spectacular match.

Yes the contact and tackle were awful, but if the RFL take a more realistic approach (and only ban one player) we are all going to be entertained on Saturday by a match full of action, passion and big hits!! If both teams are at full strength it'll be even better!!

I Think both will play on Saturday, not much in both incidents. However, if I would have to guess who would get a ban it would be Carvell. IMO, Morley will get away with a warning definitely.

Looking at some of the posts on here, a lot of people seem to have different views on it! Some people think Morley will be banned and some Carvell.

I think it could go either way for them both depending on how it's viewed by the panel.

I think we will lose one of them.

Good post but I can't believe for one moment that the panel take any teams next game into account. They have to jugde on what they see and any other circumstances that help them to reach a fair decision. I still think Moz was wrong footed and the challenge was clumsy but nothing more. Carv's was a case of leading with the forearm imo and that must carry a ban of some kind. I'd love both to play on Saturday but can't see that happening. If one or both are missing it will make yet another home win against the pies taste even better.

The RFL didnt take bans into account with Quins. They had numerous injured but still banned LMS.

All charges now posted including Myler and McGoldrick

[urlhttp://www.therfl.co.uk/about/disciplinary.php?&startrow=0[/url

The Fielden and Newton one are baffling, didnt see Myler stamp either. Im sure they make them up

Carvell will get banned. I cant see them overlooking his offence.
Morley, again, I don't think it will be overlooked either but with a lesser charge. I think 2 games and 1 game respectively.

As the game was on Sky, there is alot of pressure on the RFL as the whole viewing public will be checking on the outcomes with interest. This, as apposed to a non-TV game where it would typically just be in the interest of the player, club and its fans.

That's my view.

If both banned we will struggle to beat Wigan IMO.

[iDavid Ferriol:

Use of forearm in possession of the ball in 48th minute (Gale)
Decision No charge
Details of Charge / Reason for NF Player does not promote forearm, accidental contact with opponent [/i

[iStuart Reardon:

High tackle in minute 66th minute (Roby)
Decision No charge
Details of Charge / Reason for NF Clumsy attempt to tackle, makes contact with head of opponent, no intent or malice, on field caution appropriate [/i

shame Our game was on TV and both incidents were bitched about at length by all Wiga....sorry Sky commentators

I suppose a box set Blu ray disc is sent with love from Sky to the RFL to add weight to the case against....unlike this bloke from Rochdale Hornets

Late/high challenge on kicker
Decision No charge
Details of Charge / Reason for NF Late challenge, DVD inconclusive, Referee dealt with appropriately