I honestly thought I would never see the day, that I thought rugby league would be ranked as low as professional darts,American wrestling and some bloke on itv wrestling having his mask ripped off-when unconscious, would stoop so low, as to attract a tv audience.

Tonight, I saw it. Now I admit to having a betting interest on Crusaders to win the game, but the descion(sic) of the ref/video ref to allow the Saints try, brought the game into disrepute-big time. Why don't we just admit that SKY dictate. Quite convenient that the race for 2nd/3rd goes to the final game of the season.

words fail me, if you want proof of sky-dominated games, just have a look through the shocking ref/video ref descions (sic) that have occured over the past few years on live games.

Ultimately, this could cost Crusaders a top-8 place and a cash windfall.

Think you're getting a bit carried away; It was nothing more than a sh*t* Call. Saint would have won the game anyway, as crusaders would have fell of towards the end of the game.

So do I it has been posted on every board

Christ!

Dearly wanted Crusaders to win crap call, but so was the one he disallowed for Saints, I said before the decisions the call could be anything as Smith is crap.

Can you really not spell "decisions"?

Nobody cares about that race. Nobody outside of the two clubs has got any interest in it, most Warrington fans are going to be far more concerned about next week than who finishes 2nd or 3rd, and the Saints fans know that Saints will beat Warrington at Halliwell Jones or Knowsley Road so its not important to them.

If you want to pull someone up about bad spelling/grammar remember, that the question mark goes inside the speech marks.

I'm not sure that's correct. The speech marks are there to indicate quotation: The question was not within the quotation, the question contained the quotation, therefore the correct place for the question mark should be outside the quotation marks.

Not that I give a ****

Don't know why I get involved.

I think the title of this thread is missing the word "obsessed"

"deluded?"

I hope I put the question mark in correct place.

back on the subject..got to be one of the worst decisions ever(hope ive spelt it right)..and more to the point i hope we are not on the recieving end of a video ref call next week or another bad decision from silverdud....

Spot on, Everyone in the ground thought it ws a knock on but with Smith you always have a chane

Quote ="Tezzerwolf"If you want to pull someone up about bad spelling/grammar remember, that the question mark goes inside the speech marks. '" wiki.answers.com/Q/Is_punctuatio ... tion_marks

Quote ="Tezzerwolf"If you want to pull someone up about bad spelling/grammar remember, that the question mark goes inside the speech marks. '" wiki.answers.com/Q/Is_punctuatio ... tion_marks

why dont you put a bet on then if you 'know' so clearly

What odd's you offering?

Brilliant - earlier this season you accused the game of the same because you reckon that Sky fixed it so that all the live tv games are close fought affairs. In fact you sent me a pm advising me to heavily back any team on Sky that gets a big handicap eg Crusaders last night.

Now you are accusing the game of doing the opposite - I guess because you followed your knowledge of the "Sky conspiracy" and ended up losing money (again).

I would be interested to hear your thoughts on the Kennedy assasination, the moon landing and Diana's car crash.

Kennedy = Eddies fault
Moon landing = Skys fault
Diana = Stevo's fault

What no Clarkey in there? Thought he would be accused of something!

he'll be getting blamed for nick clegg's "accident"

What an absolute load of rubbish this post is. Let's face it, it was purely and simply a very poor decision, simple as that.

9/11

Totally agree. We have all seen them. Each club has had there fair share of them.

Personally I dont mind the ref making a mistake in "that split second" (well maybe a couple of hours after the game after the addrenalin has subsided) but the video refs have so many camera angles etc.