Lee and Benny Harrison were called of the field after celebrating the Cup win for drug tests which toook 4-5 hours, so they couldn't celebrate.

RLFans made up fact of the day.

Sportinglife mentions something about this to be fair PY including a TS quote.

I read this in the News Of The World.

Its in most sunday red tops today as well.

They may well have been tested (which is only right) but it would not have taken 4 - 5 hours or stopped them celebrating.

This was also in the Newspaper The People with a direct quote from Che himself, although not sure about the 4-5 hours bit, also surprised to see us plastered all over the front page from said paper with the headline "The Hicks Factor", how long before this is turned into a t-shirt

THe article doesn't say what the OP stated though so PY is correct.

The same paper that has given up completely on reporting the news and now goes out of its way to MAKE the news?

Sven Goran Eriksson, Sarah Ferguson and now the Pakistan cricket team.

Maybe they were nervous and it took them ages to pee?

Yeah. I didn't say I believed it, just that there was an article on it in there.

[url=http://www.sportinglife.com/rugbyleague/news/story_get.cgi?STORY_NAME=rleague/10/08/28/RUGBYL_Cup_Drugs.htmlLink to article.[/url

He isn't happy because it took Lee 4-5hrs to pee in the cup last time he was tested, and had the same happened again, he would have missed the celebrations

Ooh stage frights a pain.

Maybe he was holding it in until it wears off?

For about 6 weeks then.

Stupid I may be but your certainly not with me, I'm not that Stupid!

This story was in the (paper version of) Sunday Times today also, along with a very complimentary piece about Warrington.

If true and one or even both were to test positive would that mean that Warrington would be stripped of the title/trophy and be made to pay money back or would the RFL deem banning one or both as sufficent punishment?

Please ignore the Wigan idiot above (BBB). We're not all like that. It' happens all the time. Get a copy of Kris Radlinskis book ( a superb read for real rugby league fans). When he won the Harry Sunderland trophy and became the first man to score a hat trick in the final, he was selected for the pee test.
He was so dehydrated he couldn't give the sample and he had to drink litres of water and couldn't get on the coach back to Wigan. It was something like 4 hours before he could give his sample and then get a lift back to join the celebrations.

That's how it works, right or wrong. And again apologies for the Wigan idiot.

you arrogant know it all prick, it was a genuine question.

You got owned by Rogues

What makes you think that one or both would test positive, which was your inference.

Grow up.

Nothing, i simply wanted to know if a player who had helped his team win a final tested positive for drugs would cause the team to have their title stripped away, i should have worded it better but it was in no way an attempt at trolling

to answer your question, no!

did wigan get penalised when hock got tested positive? no.
the ban would be handed to the individual, not sure if he'd lose/ they'd lose their medals tbh.

but Hock never tested positive after helping Wigan win a final/championship/trophy, if he had, would we have had that cup and any money taken away