Well get off the beach then and get some work done!

Getting confused with st pete now in one post he says he's in the States and is 5hrs behind,that implies East Coast time, his next post says he's on the strip and on the strip ,that says L.A to me and that's West Coast time ie 8hrs time difference.

Florida is east coast and has a strip

I'm also a tad confused. On the one hand St pete (sic) says he has simply logged on and trolled over on to the Turkey after Saints beat us on Friday and is not obsessed. Yet he has posted five times since the game. Despite being out of the country. On 'business'.

Also, I called him out originally for his derailing of this thread (which saw his post starting "Not seen the article but I don't blame him for his dislike of Salford under this current idiot Dr Cockrash..."icon_wink.gif on Thursday night. We are not sure which part of the USA he claims to be in, but wherever it is, I assume Thursday comes before Friday? All we know for certain is that by his own admission he is "by the well".

He's not obsessed with us though. And neither are his partners in trolling Magic Superbeetle, newgroundb4wakey (doesn't that pseudonym just say it all), WidnesJohn, Viking Warrior, Gruntfuttock, et al. Remember: NOT obsessed.

Has anyone got a link to his article?

I've not read what Gary Schofield has said about Salford but "IF" he refers to the fact that you have spent large amounts of contract money and possibly on transfer fees too to entice star players to your club and that the fact that you are languishing in a lowly league position presently, then would he be wrong?

Both Wakefield and Bradford (without their current points deduction) would only be a point behind Salford,whilst the Tigers would be 13 points ahead despite probably spending a damn lot less than you have

Most fans i speak to refer to your clubs players as being RL mercenaries who moved there for one reason only

Surely this is not going to enable Salford to attain the required culture within your club to challenge at the top any time soon?

Glad you've brought this up mate. A fresh new voice on the board. Look forward to your further input. Any thoughts on our attendances?

I'm more concerned if he has a condensing name for the Doc. And maybe he knows where the Myler money went.

Like Dr Compress perhaps?

would that be the ones sad voyeurs go to, so people are right when they think st pete is a stalker.

Not in florida now my friend.

ST PETE .the scouser... we may go in the rovers for a pint.... or the cabin for choccy bar... at least we dont bury our own familys under patios in a now defunct e soap... get a grip u nob

A honest bloke and is correct.

Eh? Is this a clue to a famous person or character and we're meant to guess or something? I'm going for Sherlock Holmes. Am I right?

Is it an anagram?

Broken hearted iconoclasts ?

Cryptic stuff...

I'm guessing that the grammatical error is deliberate due to a hidden anagram.

Incontestable Hock Soar Red

Very apt, and thoughtful of you. Also correct.

Here's one for you OFFTHECUFF...

Boring Saint adopts lunging bell end

You Manc idiot. I've not mentioned the rovers for a pint or going in the cabin. I think you'll find that was somebody else. I've not got personal at all on this thread at all.

Give St Pete a break team. He`s on his school holidays at the moment swatting for his English Language exams.

As for his dislike of our beloved Reds - just check his anti Salford diatribe for the past 3 months.

What a fine advert for the rugby league family this thread is.

Garry was sticking the boot into Salford yet again in his column in a Sunday newspaper.

Rightly or wrongly, he's been slagging your club off at every opportunity all season.

Don't know if you lot have seen it but he slaughtered the Doc again, questioned what Harris was doing, claimed the attitude of the team stunk, took the pi*s at your 3,000 crowds and said you won't trouble the top five next season

You read what the cretin writes?

MR BITTER!

Can't make my mind up if Gary Schofield and Bruce Forsyth are one and the same person or is it just a mancrush that Bruce as got.(Whe Gary speaks Bruce comes on a visit)
On second thoughts it's two are$eholes talking what are$eholes produced.

Sorry to disappoint but as a rival supporter my views on Salford's season are quite positive. Over the years I've watched the game you've generally played attractive rugby regardless of results. It seems you still do, judging by some of the tries I've seen on TV highlights. Wouldn't be surprised to see you progress as much next season as you have this.

You clearly didn’t watch us in the Harvey, McCormack, Harrison, McRae and Nobel years then. The only time in my life time I can remember us playing an exciting brand of rugby was under Veivers a couple of seasons ago and before that most of the Andy Gregory years before we went into decline.