Quote="adamred4life"Everyone needs to stop having a go at marwan here and saying he's already got us in enough sh**, when your governing body **** (REMOVED) **** then he has a right to call a no vote, people trust me when I say this marwan has opened a storm here that the rfl are going to find very very hard to defend against, **** (REMOVED) ****
Possible libelous comments - Removed by Moderator - Please be aware that we must adhere to the rules of the forum.'"
Holy S**t. That's seismic. Part of me hopes that is true, part of me hopes it's not.
Magic Weekend could turn into Tragic Weekend for our friends at the RFL pretty quickly if evidenced!
Quote="Dr Chim Richalds"Ha ha ha ha me have a word with myself?? Heremaia was charged with punching but submitted an early plea.
From the disciplinary hearing notes
Lovely stuff!!
But I suppose that doesn't sit with your theories that the incident was only reported a week later.'"
The latest charge is based on the accounts of the touch judge and an opposing player. That same touch judge presumably couldn't even see punches being thrown 2 weeks ago as the evidence against Moore for that offence states "the exact nature and force of the punches cannot be clarified from the DVD". If that was the case why didn't they take the TJ's evidence into account then as surely spotting a punch is easier than spotting an eye gouge through a group of 15-20 players.
If it was reported to the referee at the time why was it not dealt with when the other offences were - given that the TJ clearly saw it!!
Quote="Fordy"The latest charge is based on the accounts of the touch judge and an opposing player. That same touch judge presumably couldn't even see punches being thrown 2 weeks ago as the evidence against Moore for that offence states "the exact nature and force of the punches cannot be clarified from the DVD". If that was the case why didn't they take the TJ's evidence into account then as surely spotting a punch is easier than spotting an eye gouge through a group of 15-20 players.
If it was reported to the referee at the time why was it not dealt with when the other offences were - given that the TJ clearly saw it!!'"
No you're absolutely right mate. The touch judge despises Wakefield soooooo much and wanted to tarnish a player's reputation that he decided to lie and say that he saw an eye gouge when one absolutely and unequivocally did not happen. What's more the MRP have decided to lie and say that the incident was reported at the time on the night when it obviously wasn't. You've got them bang to rights here mate! Well done you. You should contact the national papers with this.
I feel for Salford fans, splashcash is like a spoilt little child. Wah, I want to buy success. Doesn't work like that Ming the Unscrupulous. Best thing he can do is sell the club and let someone with a bit (lot) more credibility run it. He's the laughing stock of RL.
Quote="bezzerscr"Probably the same reason those suffragettes chose to break the then law so people called Julie could be given the right to voice an opinion.'"
You are having a giraffe! You are comparing him to a suffragette
nobody is forcing him to be part of the body that enforces those rules.
Quote="EASTCOASTFC2016"I feel for Salford fans, splashcash is like a spoilt little child. Wah, I want to buy success. Doesn't work like that Ming the Unscrupulous. Best thing he can do is sell the club and let someone with a bit (lot) more credibility run it. He's the laughing stock of RL.'"
All views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the RLFANS.COM or its subsites.
Whilst every effort is made to ensure that news stories, articles and images are correct, we cannot be held responsible for errors. However, if you feel any material on this website is copyrighted or incorrect in any way please contact us using the link at the top of the page so we can remove it or negotiate copyright permission.
RLFANS.COM, the owners of this website, is not responsible for the content of its sub-sites or posts, please email the author of this sub-site or post if you feel you find an article offensive or of a choice nature that you disagree with.
