Quote ="king of the shed"The most telling statement of the article is the following:
[i“Again, we've kept editing of the interview to a bare minimum”[/i
In other words we've taken out any salient facts but kept in the controversial headlines like most unreadable rags do!'"
Some of the drivel that's been written on here just does my head in (see above) `editing to a bare minimum' means just the `ers' and `ummm' and stuff were taken out. Even John Merry himself has written that these interview pieces are totally fair. No `salient facts' were removed by editing.
How many times do we have to say that the Salford Star supports Salford Reds - we've even covered some of the games and ask again that if anyone wants to report on them to get in touch. But we also have a right to hold Salford Council up to account for its use of public money. Or maybe nobody on here believes in democracy and transparency and stuff any more...
