I quite enjoyed the first thirty minutes, there was some great defence from England, although N.Z didn’t have a clue how to break them down.

The only try of the game was fortuitous but how did Graham fail to score to equalise?

The game seemed to get scrappier as it went on & I was glad when the ref blew up for the end, if that’s the best the sport can muster, God help us.

We were saying exactly the same thing Hill and Roby good defensive efforts, the half backs were not running up to the line there was only Roby running up before passing so McBanana took him off.

Overall two poor teams with one of them with a reasonable kicking game, best player for England I would probably say Chris Hill. I don't rate Widdop at all, had 2 good kicks in the first half and that was it, he didn't help George Williams at all as a partnership. Lastly we must have a better than Bateman in the centres stick him in the back row where he belongs.

Rubbish game. Rubbing reffing. Rubbish coaching.
Made our sport look slow and boring on national tv.

Bateman's not a centre. God only knows why McNamara put him there.
Williams isn't ready.
Widdop isn't good enough.

The backrow was poor and did sod all. Starting with Hodgson isn't working. It's taking us too long to get into the game. We need Roby on from the start as we only move forward when he's at hooker.
God knows why McNamara took him off for the end of the game. He was the only one who looked like he'd do anything.
NZ did a number on Hall this week but we need someone else in the back 5 who can drive it out of our own half. Poor choice of backs there from McNamara. And the backrow and halves have got to pull their fingers out and start helping drive it out of our half and start backing up some forward runs.

Oh and McNamara needs to get out there and start complaining about VR decisions. NZ did it last week and it worked for them this week.

With that lack of service Wadkins must be looking for Bath's phone number. He may as well get paid handsomely for being a bystander on a rugby field.

Also i doubt the coach will drop anybody.

He's got no passing game at all. He's just a good runner of the ball which, in SL, makes you look like a fantastic player at international level, well, doesn't!

Awful from England. We have the players but they are being coached so poorly. I don't belive dropping Widdop or Williams and playing Luke Gale is going to solve our problems. It's the coach that's the issue. Look at Hardaker. Been absolutely brilliant all season, but was bang average today. Offered nothing in attack. Every time he got the ball he passed it almost instantly. Don't think he drew a man in all game!

McNamara should have gone after the 2013 World Cup.

McGuire lacked quite a few things when he was tried at International level but was exciting running the ball and a terrific support player.

Now he's become a more rounded and complete HB, but dropped off in those exciting qualities above due to age/loss of speed they won't consider picking him.

In each of the last two years McGuire has been the best player on the pitch in a major final. Yet he's even overlooked for the squad, never mind the starting XIII, and Matty Smith gets in the squad.

Williams may end up being a very good player, but he's not one yet. McGuire is, yet is nowhere to be seen.

I'm not sure we were rubbish we are just England, what I mean by that is I've lost count of the number of times England or GB have won the opening test which surprisingly basically guarantees the next two sell out. Only to lose the second and get destroyed in the third. (call me a cynic "maybe I am but I've seen it all before"icon_wink.gif.

I purposely watched the body language of the Kiwi's after last weeks performance and TBH they didn't look to bothered to me.

Worst game of RL I've ever been to. It made a poor game of union look exciting.

No line speed or depth in attack. We may have a great pack but the took the ball standing still.

Even when we tried to move the ball wide our timing was all out and passes were awful.

No dummy runners no decoys no idea.

Worst game of RL I've ever been to. It made a poor game of union look exciting.

No line speed or depth in attack. We may have a great pack but the took the ball standing still.

Even when we tried to move the ball wide our timing was all out and passes were awful.

No dummy runners no decoys no idea.

Some of us said McBanana was a mistake when he was first appointed.

I remembered being attacked for calling him Mcbanana by one of the posters talking about how shambolic England were today.

McBanana is a crap coach and always has been .

Yet it still seems the English RL cannot get their heads around this.

This is a woeful NZ team shorn of half it's first teamers and yet we still cannot win.

Their should be wholesale changes for next week.

Gale and Cudjoe in and probably McGilvray.

I would be unsure about him under the high ball but NZ dont have a good kicker so less of a problem than it might be.

The team needs a bit of a buzz and some fresh players might be needed.
I would drop Hodgson as well.

Agree we should pick the best we have in every position. Maguire should be there with Widdop (one of the best halfbacks in the NRL) Gale as backup & williams around the squad for the experiance. Magilvary is up the top of the try scoring & should be played outside Cudjoe. John Bateman is not a centre he could cover if a centre is taken off during the game. I think he will be a terrific international second row in a couple of seasons but at the moment we have better. I have allways thought it a mistake to pick players out of position. I am a fan of Josh Hodgson but I would start with Roby & bring josh on to spell him but off the bench he can cover loose forward or second row at a push if injuries occour allowing three big forwards on the bench as well.

My picks for worst player were Williams who didn't seem to be able to actually hold onto the ball and Bateman who just didn't seem to have any strength, clattered into tackles and was floored immediately with no progress made.

It's ironic that mcguire used to be selected all the time when he was less of a complete standoff and more of a runner, then in his twlight years when he has honed his skills and become a real chief and creator, he is nowhere near the set up.

I'm not sure it was down to individuals we just had no structure in attack. We could have had Thurston in there and been almost as bad.

We badly missed an attacking link player, but then again there were no runners anyway. Absolutely awful attacking structure.

Maybe the stint in defence took it out of them.

I think you have a fair point about Englands extra effort in defence, on reflection I think someone like gale playing what he see's in front of him might be the best option, Widdop holds the team in position & directs well but he will not have that unexpected play in his bag or a speculative off the cuff play, Williams I am sure has that but he needs time to grow in confidence at this level to be able to fight his corner with the coach. An example today was Roby quiet rightly putting a kick through into space but no other player on the side was quick thinking enough to realise what he had done. Maybe it was fatigue after defending or they are coached to play a ridgid pattern with no room for flair?

What's Gale's passing game like?

Maybe people should look at why we had to do so much defence not use it as an excuse for a poor performance. Lucky NZs halves were terrible in the first half. If SJ was playing the game would have been finished in the first half

Pretty good.

If he's alongside Widdop I hope he doesn't, tbh.

We are playing the simplest RL game plan possible, if not one up then its a drop off from first receiver. Thats it, thats our plan. NZ can pack the middle and shoot up because can't and wont get it wide quickly. Its a game plan the rests on the other team playing poorly.

We have probably the most gifted british centre to come through this Millennium and a speedy, exciting young winger outside him and they havent been given the ball in any kind of space in 160mins.

We have one of the biggest, strongest wingers in the world on the other side who is virtually unstoppable near to the line playing outside two second rowers who are great defensively but limited going forward.

This isnt a talent issue, its a tactical one. To not score is unacceptable and we didnt even look like scoring, the lack of creativity was startling. This wasnt a case of players not having the tools to execute, its about a game plan that left them nothing to execute.

And lets not pretend we are building something here. Only Burgess and Williams are under 21, and Bateman 22. We have as many players 29 and over as we do 23 and under.

And lets not pretend that this is an accurate reflection of the quality of the English players, this isnt a case that we just arent good enough to expect to be beating Australia and NZ, McNamara's England have lost against Italy, struggled to beat Samoa, and lost to the exiles.

Luke Gale isnt the answer and McGilvery or Burgess, Cudjoe or Bateman arent taking us up a level. McNamara has to go. Being held scoreless is just unacceptable. But win or lose next week, England RL need to be looking at why we dont have a stand out half, why we dont have 2 centres demanding a shirt and why there arent 5 more behind them knocking on the door, where are our ball playing second rowers. What are we doing to mitigate our weaknesses? We have some, and we have places we need better players, but we also arent getting the best out of the great players we do know we do have,

Biggest disappointments for me have been Hodgson and Graham.

It was almost like they were playing not to lose. There was zero idea in attack, dull one up rugby that was as predictable as it was boring. Not sure what he's coaching our half backs, but they showed no creative spark whatsoever. We could have played for another hour and still not scored...

You can bet if Johnson had been playing today NZ would have won at a canter...

Just got home. That wasn't much fun at all. I don't remember anyone saying after last week that Williams wasn't international class, but suddenly he isn't? He's a young lad still learning his craft but has a lot of talent and a bright future in front of him. I'd certainly keep him in the side to play in front of the Wigan fans at the DW next week. Whether Widdop, who was equally poor, should be alongside him is another question. I can see the argument for playing Matty Smith alongside his club team-mate next week, even though Smith has had a generally very poor season, as even Wigan fans admit. But he'd surely improve our kicking game on what we saw today. I think I'd be content with Smith/Williams or Gale/Williams. But as others have rightly said, it's fundamentally more about tactics than individuals. We have two world-class wingers, and they're not getting the ball.

Regardless of personnel, our game plan was so simple it was far too easy to defend against.

I thought last year and in the World Cup we played with some creativity . We seem to have gone backwards big time.

You can only blame the coaches not the players.