Whether it goes dead or in touch kicking the ball out of play isn't a skill is it, so why not penalise both?

Presuming the OP is not on a wind up. I would like to see tries from kicks to be reduced to 2 points in junior or development competitions as at the moment a kick to the corner is a far to familiar tactic. But in the profesional or open age group keep it at 4 points.

Thank you.

Many ppl in Auz have bn saying for ages that tries frm kicks should be reduced.

Regarding stopping the clock, yes fine, but then we'll have to reduce the game to 60 minutes, otherwise it will be too much for the players, the ball-in-play time will then be too long, it's tough enough at the moment.

Yes. They've also been saying that the number of players should be reduced to 11, the game should be played in quarters, that England/GB should play NSW or Queensland instead of Australia, that scrums should be abolished etc. They're fu(king crazy. That's why we sent them to Australia.

lol!!!!!

They sent you even further, that must say something

Double lol!

I would like to see set times on goal kicks, drop outs and re starts.

Scrums to be replaced by a tap re start and if not, a penalty awarded if a team fails to pack a scrum correctly.

A 20m re start to be allowed anywhere behind the 20m line, not just centrally as it is now.

I don't understand where this mentality of having to stop certain tactics comes from. What exactly is wrong with scoring from kicks?

Because the Roosters scored too many from them last yr. And they used the kick to the corner too much, Manly-Warringah deserved to have bn closer in the GF than what they were, under the scoring system that I suggested the score in the GF would have bn 14 all. Daly Cherry-Evans won the Clive Churchill.

What do you mean they scored too many from them? How many becomes too many and, more importantly, why?? I'm really struggling to understand why a certain number of tries from kicks is a problem.

As for the GF being 14 all, that's precisely the problem with your hare brained idea. The teams were competing on a level playing field and both had the option to try to score from kicks. One team scored the most so deserved to be in the lead!

FURTHERMORE, I would suggest that rather than tinker with the game and the way it is played, we'd be better off working on the off-field stuff and securing the games future as a professional sport in the UK with a decent list of sponsors and investors.
redundancies at Bradford today, London saga dragging on to the 11th hour.......trying to stop kicking to the corners is hardly paramount to the future of the game

Nope, but if its an inch short its fantastic. What a fine line you weave.

This.
A team should be allowed to play the ball from wherever within their 20 regardless of where the ref is or the opposition as soon as they chose.

I don't like the current (new) ruling whereby the 20m restart is affected by whether or not the ball is "passed" by the team about to restart when the ball isn't even in play! It suggests that we are "in play" even when we aren't and seems counter intuitive to me. The ball is dead until it's tapped on the 20m so nothing that players do with the ball within that time should matter.

I'd change the rule on tap 20 to the good old fashioned tap it as soon as you're there, if your defence is sleeping tough.

That is the rule still, its the offence and officials that cause the delay .

You have to run it in yourself, I'd allow them to pass it to another player, forget everyone else being set, just tap and go.

The kicks to the corner is too aussie rules for me.

Of course theres high skill but too see it as a finishing play time and again in a game is boring me.

And it just means no place for smaller outside backs.

Also the arm wrestle of constant repeat sets.

I think theres 2 rule changes that would lessen their impact.

1 When you kick the ball forward the ball either has to hit the ground or the opposition before you can regather.

2 You only get 1 repeat set from a drop out. No consecutive drop outs.

I would like to see less time wasting in the game too.

3 Video ref 1 min max then handed back to ref if no decision.

4 30 seconds max on the clock for tries and kicks.

And finally Id like to see the last play rule put back - if the balls in play when the hooter sounds its still game on until it goes dead.

We should get the full 80 mins I hate tight games that finish 60-90 seconds early because that jeopardy has been taken away.

one of us is confused here, it may very well be me but you can pass it or run it yourself from a 20 metre tap, its your choice, once the tap has occurred the ball is in free play isnt it.

Your problem with not waiting until everyone is set is if the offence are ahead of the ball they are offside, if the defence arent 10 they are offside. If the offence are ahead of the ball, the defence arent back 10 and they tackle The player in possession who do you punish? Do you ignore the offensive offside? Or do you let the defence get away with an offside because the offence was?

I agree as long as all your team are behind the ball play it where you like. The other proviso for me is that the tap restart & tap penalty should be as it was in the 1960's you placed the ball on the floor played it forward with your foot then picked it up & played on, it makes it a skill & a risk so making it a judjment call as you are risking a knock on & loosing the ball.

Ok as it stands if the ball goes dead, everyone as to be set, the offence/defence/referee/TJ.

I think they should bin that, as soon as that ball reaches the 20 line and is tapped that player regardless of anything should be deemed to be able to play on, if the defence is offside when they try to affect a tackle then that's a penalty. Any of the offence that was offside at the tap should be deemed offside until the first tackle is made.

The defence dont have to be set, just the offence. It is a controlled restart so the Ref makes the decision to allow play to start but as long as the offence are set the play should start. If the defence are offside at this point it is a penalty. But refs should let play restart as long as he is ready and the offence is ready.

Okay, fine keep conversions and the number of points for tries from kicks the same as tries from passing plays.

But interchanges should be reduced to 8, and the number on the bench to three, teams more and more are putting 4 forwards on the bench; IMO there should be a law whereby only 2 recognised front row forwards are allowed on the bench.

It's not rugby union. We don't have recognised front row forwards. We have players who often play in one position. There are players who are on the borderline of positions. What if a club brings on a second rower but plays him at prop? Plenty of second rowers have spells of effectively doing props work. Unenforceable without significantly changing the game and is unnecessary.
Same goes for 8 interchanges from 3 players. All this will encourage is less diversity in players and more focus on fitness and percentages etc. No space for a Feka type prop or a Burrow type half on the bench.

10 from 4 is about right. If we want more game breaking players on the bench then reducing the opportunity to have one on the bench isn't going to help. We also (NRL included) need to start producing some more.