Ha Ha, that's not the way Richard Agar tells it but hey, you know best!

So Richard Agar served a suspension that wasnt reported by the RFL? And paid a fine the RFL said he only had to pay half of? And the RFL charged with publicly with one offence whilst secretly charging him and punishing him for another.

And up until this point everybody kept this weird situation secret just in case 3 years later they could let Jamie Peacock off with the same offence?

Do you have any evidence whatsoever of your claim? or was the charge, suspension and fine a secret only Richard Agar knew about

You believe what you like as you normally do.

Have you watched the peacock video yet, he should be nowhere near MoS

We can take that as a no then.



What an idiotic thing to make up when it was so easily verifiable

I have no need to search anything, I know exactly what you're referring to. It was spotted by people at the same time as the Hardaker comments and nobody assumed Peacock was using the word in that way. Do you know why? Because it's ridiculous.

There's a theme emerging about your posts isn't there.

So, can you now show us all where somebody said you shouldn't have an opinion?
Or did you make it up? You know, like the rest of your assertions.

jp will win the steve prescott man of steel award this year if all the voting is done fairly,i cannot think of a more worthy recipient than him tbh

Clark has been outstanding and dug us out of a hole several times with his movement forward. People around him have been good but he's set the platform for them to make ground too.

No he hasn't. I have seen enough games. Huby, Lynch, Millington lay the platform, that Clark being the excellent player he is, feeds off. Not the other way round.

[url=http://www.theguardian.com/sport/2011/apr/04/rfl-hull-richard-agar-refereeThis[/url was the incident in question; Richard Agar has confirmed privately that it was viewed more seriously by the RFL, because he used the same word that JP used to describe Mr Child. He was mortified that it had been interpreted as homophobic - just like the misunderstood Mr Hardaker.

JP's outburst does seem to have been brushed under the carpet, wouldn't you say?

You can take it how you want STA, fact is you're boring me to tears but that's par for the course.

Despite your best efforts to make this into something else, My point stands, the video is there for all to see and on both playing ability and being undesirable Jamie Peacock should be nowhere near the MoS award.

You can pontificate all you like now

Nothing's made up except in your head, it's there you've seen it and in whatever context Peacock used the word "bent" when shouting abuse at a gay official he was in the wrong. I thought he was supposed to be an intelligent man, if so you'd think he'd know better.

Now can you point out to me where I said you had nominated someone as MoS or did you make that up.

What a travesty that would be not to mention an insult.

Careful Fully, if you don't agree with the mob from Leeds you're deluded, fantasising, making things up and have some kind of agenda. Heaven forbid that you might voice a valid point which doesn't fit their beliefs.

Erm, in what way was it viewed as a homophobic insult. There is nothing within that that mentions the word 'bent' he wasnt suspended, he was fined. He wasnt charged with making a homophobic insult, he was charged with the offence he was punished for which was nothing to do with a homophobic insult.

So what we are apparently supposed to believe is that Richard Agar said, in an interview, James Child's performance was 100% the reason Hull lost, that his performance was "just disgraceful" and "completely ruining the game as a spectacle", but he also in the same interview said that Child was 'bent'. The RFL then secretly investigated him for for calling him 'bent', secretly punished him for it, whilst publicly investigating him for saying Childs performance was 100% the reason Hull lost, that his performance was "just disgraceful" and "completely ruining the game as a spectacle" and publicly punishing him for it, his punishment being in line with those levied against coaches for similar outbursts. But nobody at any stage reported the Agar calling Child 'Bent', nobody reported the RFL investigating it, nobody reported the RFL charging him for it, and nobody reported him being punished for it.

And it's JP's outbust being brushed under the carpet?

Hopefully it will whip you in to another hissy fit, perhaps you can make up a story about James Webster getting a secret years ban for wearing white boots, but JP's are just brushed under the carpet

You mean now you have been caught making things up......

And I've seen every game.

Therefore, I think my judgement counts a little bit more. He goes off the field and there's a visible difference. He returns and the team sparks into life, feeding off of his runs through the middle. He lifts the side.

Well you point out to me where anything has been done about Peacocks foul mouthed tirade aimed at the official in which he also used a word which a Gay official might find very insulting. It was live on TV, all over Twitter and Facebook yet nothing has been done about it even though it's at least as bad as Hardakers transgression.

Only one having a fit is you fella, Peacocks not fit to win such a prestigious award and no amount of foot stamping and holding your breath will change that.

Well it seems that Peacocks punishment is exactly the same as Agars. Perhaps they both went to the same imaginary secret RFL court.

Jamie Peacock MBE is demonstrably and provably and undeniably and unarguably fit to win such a prestigious award and no amount foot stamping, holding your breath, crazy made up stories about Richard Agar getting secret RFL punishments is going to change that.

So We'll take it that you can't then and that it's been ignored because it's Jamie Peacock and we can't have him being seen doing something so vile.

That'll do me thanks

But being caught on camera during a live national broadcast, screaming obscenities at an official whilst also using a homophobic word that is offensive to said official who is Gay should change that and anyone with an objective view would see that.

You are right, i can't find any evidence of punishing 2003 MOS, former England and GB captain, winner of 8 SL titles, 4 WCC, and 2 CCs Jamie Peacock MBE being punished for homophobic abuse which only exists in your head. Similarly i cant find any evidence of Richard Agar being punished for a homophobic incident which only exists in your head.

Frankly, im struggling to find evidence that anything exists in your head.

Well, sadly for you, you cant change history. Just like you cant go back and make the RFL punish Richard Agar for a homophobic insult nobody else in the world knew of, you cant go back 11 years to 2003 when Jamie Peacock prove demonstrably, unequivocally, unarguably, he was worthy of winning the Man of Steel award, by winning the the Man of Steel award.