I don't mind the Wigan home shirt but those shorts are awful.

The Wakey shirt looks quite smart.

Hull have the best kits by a mile so far, the kooga shirts appear to have had 'colourful' designer let loose on them. Wigans away shirt is nice though.

A mate of mine who was the designer at a sportswear company i used to work for would have come up with some beauties! All the superleague teams would have looked like hippies or drugged up ravers



I'm a big fan of our away kit and will probably buy that one but the home shirt is ruined by the slashes on the front. There isn't any need for them and it'd have been far better without them.

I like our away but don't think it would look good with a sponsorship logo accross the front.

The Kooga designer must be stuck in a early 90's time warp there designs past few years have been shocking

Cheers!

Apart from the fact that he makes them look like they're back to front, those home shorts remind me of that hideous "Eternal Beau" crockery design.



Amos, however, would make anything look stunning

Wakefield Shirt is very smart.
Wigan away is ok, bit plain without any sponsors.
Wigan home kit, don't like the black collar.

Did'nt think it could get any worse after seeing Bradford's home shirt but the Saints home shirt is truly awful.

dont like rovers first kit it looks like wigan, away kit is all right.

It would appear the Bulls home shirt has been changed slightly. Looks better IMO.

I must be the only one that quite likes the bradford shirt, minus the arms, likes the two wigan kits and thinks shorts look pretty cool.
Not mad on the wakey one tbh
Need some more lower league kits displayed

my first thought was it was influenced by the popular beat combo "Cameo" and their apperance on Top of the Popa singing "Word Up" some time in the 80's......



Both wigan kits are bloody awful, as is the bulls, and if the rumours about the rovers kits are to be belived (also made by Kooga) it looks like they've achieved a hat trick of shockers.

Pretty smart by Bradford.

Get approached with an outrageous design, unveil it, then seemingly smarten it up (very subtely, I can sense a change but can't put my finger on it...) to make it look less horrible.

Still disgusting in my opinion, but less so than before.

I suppose it is slightly better.....

Are you sure that the "new" version is just the shirt that the players will wear, with the one Langley modelling the replica which will go on sale?

Just been through the thread, some nice shirts, but some bloody awful ones too!!

Favourites; Salford, Donny

Awful: Bradford, Warrington,

All they've done is altered where the coloured lines are on the shirt, i.e. top red one goes through the C on JCT600 whereas on Langley's it goes through the T

Huddersfield Away??? www.superleague.co.uk/~therflc/u ... height=261

Huddersfield Away??? www.superleague.co.uk/~therflc/u ... height=261

Quote ="Frosties."Huddersfield Away??? www.superleague.co.uk/~therflc/u ... height=261'" training kit. Official kit getting shown to the public today.

Quote ="Frosties."Huddersfield Away??? www.superleague.co.uk/~therflc/u ... height=261'" training kit. Official kit getting shown to the public today.

Official Home kit.

Actually a bit more than that, I suggest?. There are a number of apparent changes, including the neck and shoulders, but the most significant is that the "slash" stripes appear to have been widened, the red has been made more prominent, the stripes have been straightened a bit and have been angled more sharply down and centred to give something approaching a "V". the previous iteration looked a bit like a tee-shirt that had been slashed by a cave bear, IMO.

V nice the Giants one.

V. Nice.

If their rugby wasn't so negative and immoral I'd consider purchasing it.

Dont like that Giants one at all, I'll be sticking with last years... whats with the Maori symbols??