|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 8991 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Sep 2009 | 15 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Sep 2024 | Jun 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| It seems this debate is now the refuge of those who were hoping and praying for the down fall of the WC.
Now that's in the clear, it seems hoping and praying for the downfall of RL in the UK is the next best option.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 215 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Apr 2011 | 14 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Dec 2014 | Mar 2014 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote ="bewareshadows"It seems this debate is now the refuge of those who were hoping and praying for the down fall of the WC.
Now that's in the clear, it seems hoping and praying for the downfall of RL in the UK is the next best option.'"
The main sabateur of the WC would appear to be the said Lenagan with his ill timed rebellion getting the headlines just as the WC ticket sales and marketing and media efforts are getting into full flow.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 1300 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jan 2012 | 13 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Mar 2018 | Mar 2018 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote ="keighley1"If you can't be successful at the biggest, most successful club the game has ever known for the last 100 years then you aren't very good at business.
A better test would be for the said Chairman to take over Doncaster or Sheffield or even Castleford. If he did that and made any one of them as successful or even half as successful as Wigan then I would second the accolades you are bestowing upon him.
Being a successful chairman at Wigan does not really have much degree of difficulty to it.
It's kind of like being Michael jordan's coach.'"
Well Ken Davy took over tier 2 Huddersfield who have since 2006 reached 2 CC Finals + been in play offs for 5 years + produced 2 Man of Steels since2009 + won the league leaders shield shares ILs view. As does Hdgell who took HKR from tier 2 to 4 (?) consecutive play offs. As does McManus a very successful owner, As does Moran taking perennial under achieving Wolves to 3 CC wins + 2 GFs and LLS. Plus others!
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 8155 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Dec 2001 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 2025 | Jan 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| There won't be a breakaway.
What there might be is a "Super League" corporate body, similar to the Premier League in soccer. They oversee the League and market it too.
IL and his colleagues believe SL can produce far more revenue than the RFL have been doing the past contracts with braodcasters, mostly SKY.
To set up a "Super League" with obvious links to the RFL seems the obvious way to go. Surely the RFL can't say they have done well in promoting RL and SL as the idea is preposterous. Whether IL and his fellow chairmen can improve the deals and revenue remains to be seen.
It does seem pretty improbable that Mr & Mrs Hetherington will be joining the other SL chairmen who want to improve the game.
They can't do any worse than the RFL has done in the past and probably will do very much better.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 653 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Sep 2009 | 15 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Dec 2018 | Aug 2018 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote ="keighley1"The main sabateur of the WC would appear to be the said Lenagan with his ill timed rebellion getting the headlines just as the WC ticket sales and marketing and media efforts are getting into full flow.'"
That is completely unfair, the so called rebel clubs could hardly raise concerns before recommendations were made, the timing of the release of the recommendations was down to the RFL, the a majority of SL clubs have raised concerns with seven putting their names to the Lenaghan letter. That does not make the staus Quo correct, but it does mean a different solution is required.
Despite stating they would say no more until after the World Cup the RFL have published the recommendation document, you should read it. I have read it and was surprised at the lack of reference to supportive data to findings and the number of unsupported opinions and speculation, often utilising phrases to the effect of "it can never be determined, however it is believed" with regard to key issues. Those opinions may be right or wrong, but in my work (with a US owned multi-national) we would never be allowed to make significant decisions based upon opinion rather than data.
I have always taken with a pinch of salt stories of RFL incompetance, but given the importance of the decision to be made I find that report unfeasibly poor, it simply does not stand up to scrutiny. I would add that lack of evidence does not make the recommendations wrong, it makes them unsupported opinions.
Frankly proper data is required, I think the best way forward would be an interim arrangement next year of 1 up 1 down whilst competant professionals are commissioned to collate reliable data and resulting proposals brought through at the end of the following season.
I repeat the RFL report is very poor and provides no compelling evidence to support any option.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Coach | 29815 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Nov 2004 | 20 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 2025 | Jan 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote ="keighley1"Given that you had a ready made supporter base around 14,000 and were gifted a brand new stadium by DW and are located in the middle of the most prolific group of amateur teams in the country, he was hardly starting from the depths of where, let's say, Featherstone, have had to build from.
Not easy, but one of the easier, clubs to lead to success than most. As I said, let me see him hand over Wigan to someone and take on a struggling team and transform it to a top class organisation and i will eat humble pie and bow to his leadership acumen.'"
He's had to make profits out of a club that don't win a stadium and therefore don't get revenue from hospitality, a supporters club, bars, food outlets etc.
He had to put up with several overpaid players on long terms contracts taking up a huge chunk of salary cap space whilst other, more deserving players were being underpaid.
He's made so many positive changes its been incredible and whilst it may be a big club doesn't make it an easy club to manage. The pressure of expectation sees to that and in a lot of ways its more difficult then running a team like Fev (your example).
This guy is a shrewd businessman and whilst everyone may not back him, if he'd been in charge of the RFL for the past few years the game would be in a far better position. He wouldn't be able to please everyone but he'd not try to please every man and his dog and he wouldn't let the clubs that contribute the least call the shots like has been allowed to happen for too long.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 4938 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Oct 2005 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jul 2018 | Mar 2017 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| If Ian Lenegan is so shrewd and brilliant a businessman, why did he vote for the zero income Stobart sponsorship deal?
I'm no fan of the RFL but wasn't it those very same SL chairmen currently screaming the loudest who voted for the zero income sponsorship deal with Stobart, which has rendered Super League itself a zero sponsorship product?
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 5214 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Aug 2006 | 18 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Sep 2024 | Sep 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote ="William Eve"If Ian Lenegan is so shrewd and brilliant a businessman, why did he vote for the zero income Stobart sponsorship deal?
I'm no fan of the RFL but wasn't it those very same SL chairmen currently screaming the loudest who voted for the zero income sponsorship deal with Stobart, which has rendered Super League itself a zero sponsorship product?'"
Any sponsorship deal is better than no sponsorship deal - voting for the best of a bad bunch etc etc - doesn't mean there can't be complaints at the options put on the table
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 8991 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Sep 2009 | 15 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Sep 2024 | Jun 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote ="Magic Superbeetle"Any sponsorship deal is better than no sponsorship deal - voting for the best of a bad bunch etc etc - doesn't mean there can't be complaints at the options put on the table'"
Stobart was not the only deal in town.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 578 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Oct 2012 | 12 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 2019 | Jan 2019 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote ="GiantDee"That is completely unfair, the so called rebel clubs could hardly raise concerns before recommendations were made, the timing of the release of the recommendations was down to the RFL, the a majority of SL clubs have raised concerns with seven putting their names to the Lenaghan letter. That does not make the staus Quo correct, but it does mean a different solution is required.
Despite stating they would say no more until after the World Cup the RFL have published the recommendation document, you should read it. I have read it and was surprised at the lack of reference to supportive data to findings and the number of unsupported opinions and speculation, often utilising phrases to the effect of "it can never be determined, however it is believed" with regard to key issues. Those opinions may be right or wrong, but in my work (with a US owned multi-national) we would never be allowed to make significant decisions based upon opinion rather than data.
I have always taken with a pinch of salt stories of RFL incompetance, but given the importance of the decision to be made I find that report unfeasibly poor, it simply does not stand up to scrutiny. I would add that lack of evidence does not make the recommendations wrong, it makes them unsupported opinions.
Frankly proper data is required, I think the best way forward would be an interim arrangement next year of 1 up 1 down whilst competant professionals are commissioned to collate reliable data and resulting proposals brought through at the end of the following season.
I repeat the RFL report is very poor and provides no compelling evidence to support any option.'"
The 2x12 / 3x8 was recommended by KPMG.
The clubs voted in favour subject to the RFL Executive proposing a related split of Central funding .
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 1300 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jan 2012 | 13 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Mar 2018 | Mar 2018 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote ="Mr Churchill"The 2x12 / 3x8 was recommended by KPMG.
The clubs voted in favour subject to the RFL Executive proposing a related split of Central funding .'"
KPMG simply did an analysis of the past no recommended structures such as the childish 3x 8 model. Even Hetherington has conceded that the rfl relied on 'soundings' and could not point to a single vote.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 5214 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Aug 2006 | 18 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Sep 2024 | Sep 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote ="bewareshadows"Stobart was not the only deal in town.'"
That doesn't mean it wasn't the best, the rfu could of offered £1 to have rugby union on every shirt in league And the rfl could say they had a cash offer on the table but the clubs voted against it
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 1300 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jan 2012 | 13 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Mar 2018 | Mar 2018 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote ="William Eve"If Ian Lenegan is so shrewd and brilliant a businessman, why did he vote for the zero income Stobart sponsorship deal?
I'm no fan of the RFL but wasn't it those very same SL chairmen currently screaming the loudest who voted for the zero income sponsorship deal with Stobart, which has rendered Super League itself a zero sponsorship product?'"
RFL executive very strongly recommended Stobart. SL gave them their backing, seems they are not going to repeat this error?
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Owner | 20966 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Aug 2003 | 21 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jun 2015 | Feb 2015 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote ="bewareshadows"It seems this debate is now the refuge of those who were hoping and praying for the down fall of the WC.
Now that's in the clear, it seems hoping and praying for the downfall of RL in the UK is the next best option.'"
Did I miss the press release regarding 500,000 tickets being sold or the "sold out" signs up at any of the games? The last I heard was the RFL were postponing their EGM so they could concentrate on the RLWC...
As for the downfall of RL in the UK? I don't think anyone wants anything other than maybe a change at the RFL....fat Nigel has to go and he should take a few of the long term guys with him...the sport needs a major shake up.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 4938 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Oct 2005 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jul 2018 | Mar 2017 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote ="Magic Superbeetle"Any sponsorship deal is better than no sponsorship deal - voting for the best of a bad bunch etc etc - doesn't mean there can't be complaints at the options put on the table'"
The Wigan chairman is complaining about the lack of sponsorship income in the game and blaming the RFL, yet he voted for the zero income Stobart deal ahead of the £750,000 Betfair offer. Does Lenagan ever take responsibility for his own actions when it goes wrong? Does he always blame others instead?
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 4938 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Oct 2005 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jul 2018 | Mar 2017 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote ="Cripesginger"RFL executive very strongly recommended Stobart. SL gave them their backing, seems they are not going to repeat this error?'"
Not all SL chairmen gave the zero-income Stobart deal their backing.
However, Ian Lenagan did give the zero-income Stobart deal his backing.
As did McManus of St Helens.
As did all those SL chairman who are currently bleating the loudest and blaming the RFL.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 5214 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Aug 2006 | 18 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Sep 2024 | Sep 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| They also rejected 888 for engage (who offered less money), as they did betfair and stobart.
Maybe if the rfl could of convinced engage to renew or in fact any company who wouldn't be perceived to damage the brand of the sport they wouldn't of been forced to vote for a no cash deal!
If the clubs want to break away from the working class image and attract higher wealth sponsors for individual clubs (like Warrington and emirates supposedly), having a gambling company would be a nail in the coffin ...
Why is it so hard to understand brand and money need to be considered when agreeing sponsors - and the clubs can complain when there's not an option that can satisfy a little of both - not asking for a multimillion deal by a global company in a reputable industry - but a decent sized deal with a repeatable company shouldn't of been out of reach
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 4938 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Oct 2005 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jul 2018 | Mar 2017 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote ="Magic Superbeetle"They also rejected 888 for engage (who offered less money), as they did betfair and stobart.
Maybe if the rfl could of convinced engage to renew or in fact any company who wouldn't be perceived to damage the brand of the sport they wouldn't of been forced to vote for a no cash deal!
If the clubs want to break away from the working class image and attract higher wealth sponsors for individual clubs (like Warrington and emirates supposedly), having a gambling company would be a nail in the coffin ...
Why is it so hard to understand brand and money need to be considered when agreeing sponsors - and the clubs can complain when there's not an option that can satisfy a little of both - not asking for a multimillion deal by a global company in a reputable industry - but a decent sized deal with a repeatable company shouldn't of been out of reach'"
So you want one bunch of not-fit-for-the-purpose morons to take over from another bunch of not-fit-for-the-purpose morons in the running of the game?
Oh, and if you want the sport to become attractive to demographics other than poorly-educated working class, then it might be an idea to express yourself in a fashion more appropriate.
Try... could have... wouldn't have... shouldn't have
instead of
could of... wouldn't of... shouldn't of.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 5214 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Aug 2006 | 18 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Sep 2024 | Sep 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote ="William Eve"So you want one bunch of not-fit-for-the-purpose morons to take over from another bunch of not-fit-for-the-purpose morons in the running of the game?
Oh, and if you want the sport to become attractive to demographics other than poorly-educated working class, then it might be an idea to express yourself in a fashion more appropriate.
Try... could have... wouldn't have... shouldn't have
instead of
could of... wouldn't of... shouldn't of.'"
Okay, I don't think at any point any of the clubs have said they want to have total control over the sport, just more of a say over its direction - that said you don't know how well or otherwise one group of people would run the sport over the current regime so for you to automatically write them off as not fit for purpose is merely conjecture
I'm not even going to bother to get into the audacity I had by writing of instead of have, as criminal as that is I didn't know my posts were being used to attract potential sponsors
You were the one who said poorly educated - Liverpool has one of the highest concentrations in the country for degrees, but are still looked upon as a working class city - you can be seen to be in a working class region with highly educated people in it - or are you just going to use my grammar and ignore my point again?
I'm glad you admit the rfl are not-fit-for-purpose and thus totally vindicate the reason why these complaints have been raised by the clubs.
The sport can and should be attracting better sponsorship options then they did - just because lenaghan or McManus or anyone else voted for it doesn't invalidate their point now.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 1300 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jan 2012 | 13 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Mar 2018 | Mar 2018 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote ="William Eve"Not all SL chairmen gave the zero-income Stobart deal their backing.
However, Ian Lenagan did give the zero-income Stobart deal his backing.
As did McManus of St Helens.
As did all those SL chairman who are currently bleating the loudest and blaming the RFL.'"
Not true. Given only the Hetherington clubs supported the rfl plan there are plenty of clubs (pro and anti stobart) now blocking Wood's folly'.
As I said it is evident that many SL clubs have learned not to trust the rfl executive after the stobart debacle.( + the rfl buying odsal + the sport England funding losses).
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 16250 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2002 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Feb 2020 | Feb 2020 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| I think some people need to go away and read the policy review document. It takes of whole or all game solutions, something IL appears to not want. Just wants to feather his own nest.
Theres none so blind as SL fans (alot of them anyway)
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 16250 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2002 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Feb 2020 | Feb 2020 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| I'll reword that actually. Theres none so blind as Smokey and Gutterfax who care little for anything beyond their own clubs.....oh a bit like SL chairmen.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Board Member | 16601 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Aug 2002 | 22 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Mar 2024 | Nov 2023 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| A few observations
Ian Lenagan is a very successful entrepreneur that the sport needs
If Ian told his supporters at Oxford Utd that he believed p&r should be banned he would be lynched for killing the dream, as he hasn't put an alternative forward I will reserve judgement
He has done a great job at Wigan, with Wane, in turning up the speed of junior development and for that the sport owes him
The timing is shocking as Championship clubs have recruited based on what we have been told and are about to market season tickets on the wave of new hope.
SL clubs hold the voting control and have been part of this all the way
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Owner | 33944 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2004 | 21 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Mar 2016 | Mar 2016 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote ="DemonUK"I think some people need to go away and read the policy review document. It takes of whole or all game solutions, something IL appears to not want. Just wants to feather his own nest.
Theres none so blind as SL fans (alot of them anyway)'"
The problem is, the RFL are great at ' talking ' ,but rubbish at ' walking ' , do I believe they are capable of delivering a ' whole sport ' solution based around primarilly a re structure? Nope
We dont actually know what the SL ' Rebels ' are advocating, it would be nice for somebody to ask them
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 653 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Sep 2009 | 15 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Dec 2018 | Aug 2018 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote ="maurice"A few observations
Ian Lenagan is a very successful entrepreneur that the sport needs
If Ian told his supporters at Oxford Utd that he believed p&r should be banned he would be lynched for killing the dream, as he hasn't put an alternative forward I will reserve judgement
He has done a great job at Wigan, with Wane, in turning up the speed of junior development and for that the sport owes him
The timing is shocking as Championship clubs have recruited based on what we have been told and are about to market season tickets on the wave of new hope.
SL clubs hold the voting control and have been part of this all the way'"
And there you have the nub of the problem, SL clubs have been consulted in so far as there have been meetings (they have also consistently asked for further detail) after the last meeting of SL clubs it was widely reported that there were still 2 options on the table, both 12 club options, those two 12 club options are quite radically different. It was also widely reported that 4 SL clubs had wanted to further investigate a 10 club option, but only Huddersfield had argued strongly for that option.
So the SL clubs had narrowed down options, yet you now state that Championship clubs have recruited based on what they were told was about to happen.
That seems to suggest that either:
All the Championship clubs have misinterpreted what they have been told;
All (or nearly all) the SL clubs have misinterpreted what they have been told, or
Championship and SL clubs have been given different messages.
Now go and re-read the RFL recommendation, specifically the section on marketing of season tickets when you do not know who you will be playing in the last 7 matches, whilst doing so consider that in the period covered by licencing only 3 clubs have finished in the top 8 every season. That is a huge risk to take without any clear marketing solution, a risk that would be funded directly from the pockets of the likes of Ken Davy, Adam Pearson or Steve O'Connor, those three would not like that at all, but they can afford it better than the likes of Ryan Whitcutt or Michael Carter.
There are what appear some good ideas in the RFL document, but little evidence. The SL clubs were promised developed options for discussion and the RFL attempted to deliver a fait accompli without further discussion. That fait accompli includes a league format that actually only spreads the existing pie a little further, from 14 to 16 clubs, in doing so it introduces a genuine risk that SL season tickets may be more difficult to shift, based on this seasons finishing places that could cost Bradford, Wakefield, Widnes and Cas far more than the TV revenue they are asked to give up, the following year it could also significantly affect income for every other SL club.
Now if you took the other 12 team option with a 1 up 1 down you could redistribute the TV revenue of the 2 reduced nr SL clubs plus 1 of the 2 RFL shares and give 50% SL funding to the top 6 Championship clubs. That would go some way towards enabling 6 of the Championship clubs to operate to the £ 900k salary cap. There are different ways you could do play offs, I personally would make 2 SL places available, I would promote top of the championship automatically and put 11 & 12 in SL in a play off series with 2 & 3 from the Championship, with 11SL and 2 Championship seeded for home play off v the opponent from the other league, winners play in SL qualifying final.
That would allay the absolutely genuine marketing concerns, help build a stronger championship and give three highly attractive meaningfull sudden death play off fixtures to add to the TV package as genuinely compelling fixtures.
I genuinely believe the SL teams wouls accept something like I have outlined above and I believe it would be better for Championship clubs, spreading meaningful funding to 18 not 16 clubs.
|
|
|
|
|