You seem to have a policy where you appear to force these assumptions at me and make it appear that I am against everything you have said old lass. Fwiw you are pushing against an open door for most parts I and a lot of Wakey fans agree with what you are saying in the main, its just that you try and make it appear that you know everything and all you know is what Wadski tells you not withstanding labouring the point as well. When you know something that we do not then come back and tell us.

As for your embarrassment I doubt if you could even spell it. Oh and I dont have to go canvassing its done by pm. And judging by those I have recieved my dear you are not as popular as you would like to think. Cannot understand why though really.

OK - just so certain pathetic posters can move on with their life, I will say it:
[i
We are on street moneywise and will struggle like hell when they next give the franchises out.

[/i

Thanks for taking the time away from brown nosing to spew some more invective.

You think I give a t*ss about being popular on a forum. Grow up.



You have got some pm's so you think you can speak for Huddersfield. That sums you up

I suppose it is better than making up what I say and then avoiding the issue when asked for proof.

Now, away from the population of Hudds pm'ing you



Do you think letting in kids free like the Giants do is a good thing?

Very good Clan. Better than you usually manage. I know the misquoting technique is very popular with the hard of thinking.

Back to topic. As John Kear says that a new stadium would cause financial problems to melt away (the ones he said did not exist!) How long do you think it will take to get all permissions /designs, plans and funding for your new stadium? How much will be done by the time of the next liscence application?

Why do you even care



Response... Erm, because I've got nothing better in my life to think about.

Yet another poster who wants to write about me.

500 kids?
Are you referring to the kids from junior clubs?

If so,my little one played.There were 8 junior teams ,with an average of 10 players per team = 80 kids,if you want to take an average that each kid had a sibling,then add another 80,approx 160 kids.
Not even sure they counted,as when we entered the ground,the kids and parents were guided around the turnstiles and not through them.


Although i will agree and have said it before,our crowds are appalling and a major concern.Not convinced that the public of Wakefield are bothered whether they have a team playing in the premier league of a sport carrying the cities name or not.

Its a pleasure but dont flatter yourself.

Er I know you dont give a t*ss about being popular on a forum or anywhere else for that matter dear lady. You have proved that before Sugar and I have no doubt you wont let us down in the near future, you just cant help yourself.

I would not want to speak for the people of Hudds. I am sure they have got more important things to do than talk about somebody who sole ambition in life is to try and upset people because she does not have a life of her own. Worrying though nevertheless. And yes the misquoting technique is very popular with some people, you in particular you seem to have it off to a fine art. I suppose that goes with having no friends and a lot of time on your hands.

It shows very good initiative on the part of the Hudds club to let kids in for free. Highly commendable they are the future of the club. It would be nice if our club were in a position to do the same unfortunately as you have told us at every opportunity we are not in such a position to do so. Once again if you hear anything about our club dont hesitate to imform us.

I am referring to the most recent accounts that are available,up to 11/07.
Apologies if that wasnt clear.
However those are the accounts that show the current net worth,they are the accounts that show you lost money in the season you appeared in the CC Final.
When the accounts are superseded by new ones,i will be happy to check if they have improved and turned in a profit and reduced the negative net worth of 4m.

[urlhttp://www.wakefieldwildcats.co.uk/community-activities-give-wildcats-crowd-boost-i605684.html[/url

510 kids with accompanying parents that boosted the crowd by over 1,000.

Thanks for that - i stand corrected.

The crowd was even more appalling than i thought.
Shameful.

They show a net reduction in current liabilities of £400,000 due to an increase in assets of around £550,000. This would suggest therefore an increase in revenue for the financial year.

Your 08 accounts??

When are they to be published?

No idea what's true and what isn't but best of luck to them (and any other RL club) who might be having a tough time.

I could never take joy in seeing a club go through financial hardship and suffering the possible consequences that goes with it, sadly a fair few give the impression they would like nothing better.

Damn shame

no the 07 accounts - the same ones you have.

Yet another poster who is obsessed with Wakefield

I wouldn't believe what the club say anymore than I believe the posters on here.

However if true then a shocking attendance.

It says: "Their attendance contributed to one of Wakefield’s healthiest home crowds of the season". The official attendance was one of the worst home crowds of the season, however if you add 1000 to it you get one of the healthiest home crowds of the season. This supports the suggestion that they weren't included in the official attendance.

Cheers. I didn't bother to click the link.

FFS stop this topic. 18 pages?

19 now

well done you!

Doh !!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Well if you are reading the 07 ones online from companies house.

your current liabilities increased by 215k,they didnt reduce.

Your total assets went up by £615k --- but your lending went up by over 1m.

Which ever way you look at it - the accounts show a loss of 600k that year.

But hey we are going off topic now.

about 10 pages too late mate