They used those 6 players to get promoted out of NL 2 , how do I know this ? , I watched them score the try's against Leigh in 2007

They have players playing who dont have the correct work permits or Visa's ?



Better tell the RFL or HM border control straight away



Not actually here or working ilegally are they

Who was discussing SL ?

Organic as in putting lots of ' bull ' on something and hoping it grows ? , your right , that has been tried , maybe if we put some money instead it might work

So putting a club in the Championships isn't a good way of trying to produce a Championship club ? , maybe your right , we seem to put clubs in SL and end up with Championship level clubs all the time

Maybe take a ' cash bond ' off them at the start instead , that would prevent them from ' bumping ' their ' holding company ' and paying nothing

We already have

Advantage starbug...................foot fault Smokey The A........

It's not about Rugby anymore is it?

Whasat?

Did anyone say any different? Have the UKba ruled crusaders where at fault or are they in on your mental conspiracy too?

no but the reliance on overseas players (which you defended) denies clubs in exactly the same way crusaders did (which you have criticised) the individual players paperwork is irrelevant to the consequences which.are the same

Everyone

catching up are you?

You mean like leighten Samuel did?

I have an hour to waste before a meeting and doctors is on tv. I need something to occupy me

yeah double the cost of operating for a couple of years, that would definitely make us more attractive to investors and new areas. genius!

You posted this

.

This led me to believe that you thought those players with the wrong visa's only played in NL 1 and SL , when in fact they also helped the club get promoted out of NL 2

If you meant something else , away you go , explain yourself ?

I think HKR are wrong to do what they are doing , but I understand why , I understand their ' mitigating circumstances ' , and I have no doubt given a reasonable amount of time they will start to produce more players of their own

But they aren't actually breaking any RFL rules let alone laws of the land , if you suggest they are , I've no doubt you can provide us with the ' Evidence '

So we were discussing SL ?



Where ?

Or here ?


?

Yes thanks

Like ships in the night

Did he ? , are you sure ? , how much RFL ' development ' money went through his company ?

And even if he did , is that really what we want , ' short term fixes ' as long as things are going to ' plan ' , then as soon as things arent they pull the plug then sue the people who have tried to carry the club into the future ?

Very reliable



And what were his actual motives , have a successful RL club , or just pish of the welsh RU for not playing ball , one thing is for certain , the citizens of Bridgend didn't have a good word to say for him , in fact I'm struggling to see anybody who has a good word to say for him at all

I could go back and highlight where you made the mistake, but it would be a waste of time as you have made the same error again.

The players who had the wrong visa's didnt play under the wrong visa's when in SL, which was what TonyGee incorrectly stated (among other things), which you backed up and have made the same assertion again here.

As I have stated before , it would sort out the ' Dreamers ' from the ' real deal ' or maybe you would rather somebody like Mr Vaughan or Mr Hope be allowed to take over a club again ?

Neither did Crusaders, hence the lack of censure from the RFL and the fine of only £5k for a regulatory infraction rather than the £60k which would have been fined from the UKBA had Crusaders been found guilty of not meeting the requirements for employing said players.


Why cant you understand the mitigating circumstances that faced Crusaders and why do you doubt given reasonable time they will start to produce more players of their own?