It was easier for him not to score tbf. Anyone with pace is going to score that.

He won't win it, but if we're looking beyond the obvious names that Sky bang on about constantly then Joe Westerman has been brilliant in a very average team so far. He hasn't lived up to his potential in previous seasons, but he is doing that this year. Has to make the England squad.

Agree with your last sentence, however O'Loughlin will get in based on his name and reputation. Although I wouldn't be surprised if he is injured anyway.
Westerman has been much better than Lockers this year (and he isn't made of shortbread).

From someone with money on Walsh, I can't see past peacock so far!

Didn't this get awarded to Walsh by the SKY commentary team when they broadcast the first game of the season!

Chris Hill for me, then Clarke

Peacock not even close

Not sure whether he is destined to be Man of Steel or not but Peacock is the difference between Leeds being second or third at the moment and being seventh. Anyone saying he is not even close is delusional.

Chris Hill has been the Man of Steel so far this season.

and here comes the Rhino brigade to champion their man

Most fans will naturally favour players from their own teams. It's difficult for us to judge players we don't watch regularly.

I would change the MOS voting system. I think there should be 14 nominees, on from each club. There can be an internal vote in each club to determine their representative. All players can then vote between the 14 (or 13 as you can't vote for the player from your own team) to decide the MOS.

Not really,we don't need to, any rugby league follower worthy of the name can see JP is in the mix for MOS he has been superb in almost every game so far.

Your statement just made you look stupid, hence the

So you're not a Leeds supporter then?

Do you not respect my right to an opinion?

Guessing you'll say you do but the stupid smiley says different

Peacocks not playing bad but others are way ahead of him hence he's not close, also he ruled himself out with that foul mouthed, homophobic abusive tirade at James Child during the Warrington game and the inexcusable repeated punching of a lad half his size and age

Where has anybody said you can't have an opinion?

Your final paragraph shows how we should view your opinion though.

I of course do respect your right to an opinion.

Infact, i am quite intrigued to know why you believe JP is 'not even close' to being a contender for MOS so far this season in your opinion.Please do tell...

Sorry I added a bit after you quoted me, but therein lies the answer.

I'm not suggesting for one second thatPeacock isn't playing very well just that there are at least two if not more who are playing much better and having a greater impact on the opposition.

The fact that my opinion was ridiculed.

I'm not happy to give the MoS award to a bloke who's caught on live TV abusing the official and using foul homophobic language toward the ref. The loss of control and out of context attack on a player half his size was an unedifying sight and sealed it for me.

The fact that the award is now closely associated with Steve Prescott means, IMO, that Peacock ruled himself out of contention

You do have a right to an opinion. Just as i have the right to find it hilarious.

So can you actually show us where anybody said you shouldn't have opinion?

You don't want the MoS to go to a player who's ever abused an official? That's pretty much exempted any player who's played for longer than a couple of seasons.
I don't quite see why dissent should stop a player receiving the MoS rather than say committing a spear tackle that could endanger a players life.
As for your assertion Peacock used homophobic abuse I'd stop now before the lawyers get involved if I were you, especially considering you've clearly made it up.

By the way, if in the future you don't want your opinions ridiculed, then don't post ridiculous opinions.

The videos on YouTube fella!

Go get your lawyer,

Talk about ridiculous comments.

Like I said earlier here comes the Rhino mob to back up their man

If you think referring to a referee as 'bent' is meant as any reference to sexuality then your lack of comprehension about its meaning in that situation is embarrassing.

There is no video on YouTube of Peacock being homophobic/making homophobic comments. There is only you making things up, and looking ridiculous in the process.

I haven't even suggested anyone for Man of Steel yet, not even Peacock. I think he'd be in the running but no-one has really stood out well beyond the others yet.

But carry on making a fool of yourself, it's hilarious!

Search

"Jamie Peacock to a referee - charge or no charge"


Where did I say you'd suggested someone as man of steel

Name calling on a forum, really, grow up!

Except when Richard Agar said the same word about the same referee they viewed it as homophobic and heavily fined and suspended him.

Agars quote was not sandwiched between two very offensive expletives and wasn't broadcast live on national television!

So it's not my interpretation that's in question here, however what is embarrassing is someone passing judgement without knowing the facts.
HTH

Clark has been excellent, but on the back of others. Some at Cas without the credit lay the foundation for Clark to excel.

Ones like a Peacock, who is not has good as last year do it off their own back.

Yeah, you. Richard Agar hasnt ever been suspended for making homophobic comments, or even charged with it.

Richard Agar wasnt suspended, he was find 6k, 3k of which was suspended for saying that Child was "100% responsible" for a loss.

Its not your interpretation that's in question here, its your sanity.