Dear Steve,

My name is Andy, I am a Hull FC fan.

In my opinion you are unfit fit to officiate in top flight rugby league for the try awarded to Michael Dobson tonight.

Mods, please note my restraint in the lack of offensive language.

awful decision ---- but then again its Ganson and it was on TV, when will RL fans realise ITS HIS SHOW !!!

To be fair we did well to be in it at all with those officials.

Can't actually express how angry I am.
We shouldn't have let them score that last try, but even though they did, they should still have had to score again.

foward pass so what all teams get away with them, fc was penalised a lot becouse they commited fouls end of!! bitter fc fans

well done Rovers, for the whole second half (according to Ganson) not one Rovers player offside or one Rovers player taking slightly too long to get off in the tackle....oh and no forward passes either!

I guess trolling is your thing? You got banned from the Cas board last week for the same thing!

So, the touch judge misses the forward pass and it's Ganson's fault?

No one is disputing that all those penalties where fair ones FC gave far to many away but you must either be blined or have your rose tinted specs screwed on to not see that Ganson cost FC that game.

But nothing will be done to Ganson nothing ever is this is one of the reason i prefer football although bad decisions are made if one ref keeps making them he will be punished unlike Ganson who makes at least 1 awfull decision a game just to keep things intresting when he on TV.

If the touch judge calls a forward pass the ref still has to acknowledge it, at some games if you stand at the front you can hear touch judges make calls refs just ignore.

He turned a blind eye in the second half to all those things and markers not standing square, then he hit with with the sucker punch, the forward pass.

Still the Sky team feel he adds something to the game.

Are you claiming the touch judge made the forward pass call and Ganson ignored it?

Champion teams need to win no matter what adversity they face. Hull lost that game themselves, no diverting attention to refereeing calls should hide that.

Ganson was less than 10 yards from the incident, much closer than the TJ. Even with the "momentum" rule, the scorer took the ball two yards in front of where the passer ended up, let alone actually passed it.

On a secondary note, penalising Westerman for standing up....

Thirdly, not penalising hkr at all in the second half......

Fourthly, and, sorry mods, he is a 2@.

To be fair Ganson was in a good enough position to call it himself, but yes, the touch judge has also got some explaining to do. Having said that, if FC hadn't let old Dave skip round them like he was, well, like he was Tom Briscoe, it wouldn't matter.

No, I'm saying it could have been a possibility - although depending on who the touch judges were they could have thought it was a fair pass because there's a large number of them only appear to do the job because they get to wave a flag about.

It was a good game overall, and credit to KR because they played well. However, that try by Dobson from Lovegrove's offload that was at least a metre forwards is an inexcusable error by the officials. I don't understand how they can miss things that are that blatant.

Ganson is always brilliant on Magic Weekends.

Yours sincerely,
Jordan Tansey

Please do me a favour, and get yourself some realism.

Hull were in complete command. Even in when Hull conceded after Martin was injured they were still two scores in front with 7 minutes left.

Hkr would not have been anywhere near a win had that imbecile of an official not missed the quarterback like pass.

If you cannot recognition that, then you are fairly dim

Ok.

Silly me for concluding that Hull FC lost because they couldn't defend a 14 point lead with 10 minutes to go and conceded 32 points.

Yes, it must have been all Ganson's fault that Hull FC lost.

I know where he lives if anyone's interested

I guess I'm dim

14 points is a winning lead, regardless of one refereeing mistake. If that causes your team to collapse from a winning position then I'd try looking a little closer to home than St Helens for the reason you lost.

And the 14 point lead would have won us the game if Ganson didn't give that try.
Even thought they scored at the end, they would still have needed another if it wasn't for Ganson's ridiculous decision.

You've no idea what would or wouldn't have happened had that try not been given. Given how Hull collapsed it doesn't strike me as entirely unlikely that they would have choked either way.

With your earlier comment, yes, dim to the extreme,



If your are not clever enough to see the effect one decision can have you are either a goldfish or dim.



Or are you suggesting, that "champion teams finding a way to win" includes being awarded a try for Jordan Tansey whilst being offside (awarded by mr ganson no less)? Does this mean "finding a way to win " Include taking the benefit of poor / bent decisions?