|
 |
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| International Star | 1896 | No
Team
Selected |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Feb 2011 | 14 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Jan 2025 | Jan 2025 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
|
TO BE FIXED |
|
|
Despite all the hype about 2 refs its not working as well as some people think.
For me Australia RL is to much stop and start.
|
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| International Chairman | 122 | No
Team
Selected |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Feb 2002 | 23 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Feb 2017 | Jan 2017 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
|
TO BE FIXED |
|
|
Second ref keeps the ruck clean (mostly) play the balls are pretty quick and they actually play the ball with the foot! would love two refs to be trialled here to see if they make a difference
|
|
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| International Board Member | 1377 | No
Team
Selected |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Apr 2003 | 22 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Jan 2025 | Jan 2025 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
|
TO BE FIXED |
|
|
There just aren't enough refs available to make this work. Made even worse by inexperienced refs getting ripped apart if they have a bad game whilst learning their trade. If you think there's loads coming through, have a look how old (or young) the TJs are at this week's game for your club. That's who the 2nd refs would be.
|
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| International Chairman | 14970 | No
Team
Selected |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Jun 2002 | 23 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Nov 2021 | Nov 2021 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
|
TO BE FIXED |
|
|
We really should have some version of 2 refs, whilst there are problems with the recruitment and development of referees, the game is too fast and under too much scrutiny for 1 ref.
We don't have to have the same system they use in Australia, I'd prefer 1 ref with a "roving assistant" to give the ref information and to give instructions to the players during play.
So it wouldn't cost much as we wouldn't need another fully trained ref per game just another touch judge, which could be paid for by getting rid of in goal judges.
|
|
|
| Rank | Posts | Team |
| International Star | 65 | No
Team
Selected |
| Joined | Service | Reputation |
| Feb 2011 | 14 years | |
| Online | Last Post | Last Page |
| Apr 2017 | Jan 2017 | LINK |
| Milestone Posts |
|
| Milestone Years |
|
|
| Location |
|
| Signature |
|
TO BE FIXED |
|
|
Just for the record, MRP / RFL state in the Rochdale v Toulouse incident :
Quote The DVD clearly shows the player being subject to a forceful grapple tackle by the opponent and both players go to the ground. The player has a broken nose and possibly had some difficulty breathing. It is accepted the opponents arm should not have been around the player’s mouth. - See more at: www.rugby-league.com/the_rfl/dis ... fY2Ce.dpuf '"
So it's dangerous, it wasn't picked up, and because the bite mark was evidenced and not the tackle, the Rochdale player got let off and the Toulouse player got 4 weeks ( the minimum ). Not fair on balance.
I think player safety needs to be the priority to lessen serious injuries, so that we get our priorities right.
Heck in my day, cracking someone's nuts, and a right hook to the jaw were part of being a man in RL. The game has rightfully moved on, so have the sponsors that support the game and the crowds that come. Something has to be done to better police the tackle.
It's urgent, IMO. Not enough ref's is lame - get enough refs or officials. |
|
Just for the record, MRP / RFL state in the Rochdale v Toulouse incident :
Quote The DVD clearly shows the player being subject to a forceful grapple tackle by the opponent and both players go to the ground. The player has a broken nose and possibly had some difficulty breathing. It is accepted the opponents arm should not have been around the player’s mouth. - See more at: www.rugby-league.com/the_rfl/dis ... fY2Ce.dpuf '"
So it's dangerous, it wasn't picked up, and because the bite mark was evidenced and not the tackle, the Rochdale player got let off and the Toulouse player got 4 weeks ( the minimum ). Not fair on balance.
I think player safety needs to be the priority to lessen serious injuries, so that we get our priorities right.
Heck in my day, cracking someone's nuts, and a right hook to the jaw were part of being a man in RL. The game has rightfully moved on, so have the sponsors that support the game and the crowds that come. Something has to be done to better police the tackle.
It's urgent, IMO. Not enough ref's is lame - get enough refs or officials. | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
