Nuff said

No, the referee that awarded the try has stuck by his decision. Nothing has been 'confirmed' by the RFL referees.

But don't let that reality detract you from your pointless crusade[size=85 (the pointless crusade being Bradford's season)[/size

Er, no.


1. I'm not a fan of either club involved.
2. It made zero difference to me whether it was given or denied.
3. And even if I did want the sort of justification that you clearly crave, then I'd have got it when the refs confirmed they consider the decision correct.

I simply added my reasoned opinion to a "was it/wasn't it" debate.


Poor love, you're confused. I used diagrams to help explain my point, not to "come to a decision".


It really doesn't. But attaboy, you keep right on flogging. Hang on - I think the horse moved...

Eddie, Stevo, Steward Cummings and the Editor of the Rugby League express thought it was no try. Who has come out saying they though it was a try?

Ferocious Aardvark and James Child. I've never seen them both in the same room.. just saying

Then again, I've never seen Stevo and The Hood in the same room, so I wouldn't trust his opinion either...