Why would anyone in their right mind give £100 to a business that clearly heading for administration in the very near future, in exchange for nothing other than a warm sense of self satisfaction?

If the current Board of Directors didn't consider what would happen to the borrowings they had secured against the ground lease when they sold it, then they're clearly not fit to hold office.

The issue isnt whether I'd donate £100 to try to save the Bulls, its whether I'd donate it now. Whether it would be just be putting off the day of reckoning. Whether it wouldn't be better to let the current legal entity to go bust and then pay my £100 towards starting again.

The problem is that the club can only ask the fans to dip into their pockets on this scale once. £500k might not be enough to save the current company (I really dont know, the club haven't yet released enough information for me to form a judgement). If the fans hand over that £500k and it doesnt work then its very unlikely that they'll fork out a second time.

Whereas if the company does go bust and then I'm asked to contribute towards a new start then I'll probably be willing to contribute a lot more than £100. Because £500k should be enough tto get the club off the ground (even if it starts in NL1).

You would have to be mad to give them the money when they have put the club in this position, I was behind Ted at Wakefield but under no circumstances would I have given a donation to help him have another go at doing the same. #saveyourcashnotbulls

This.