Pryce would be ok I think. I think hes a quality "back" and provides cover. Id pick him

I have thought about it for a second and I have come to the conclusion that suggesting Leon Pryce can play 9, 11, 12 or 13 to international standard is ridiculous. There is already significant disagreement to whether he can play in the backline to international standard

I did and still conclude that suggesting Pryce can play anywhere but prop is ridiculous

Widdop is currently playing standoff for Melbourne reserve grade, so wouldn't automatically pick him as England fullback. Tomkins seems to be doing well in the NRL style attacking fullback role, so maybe it would be good to see him there for England, although I still think him and Eastmond are the medium to long term future for England in the halves. I think Myler is overrated, Burrow is a one trick pony, and as already pointed out McGuire's excellent supporting play hides his limitations.

It's a shame Pryce never pushed himself as a centre, as I think he could have been great in that position, with his size, pace and step, as a standoff he's probably the best England have at present, but I just don't think that's his most natural position.

after mcguires shocking defensive performance against the aussies i wouldnt play him at 6 for england again

6. tomkins
7. eastmond!

Why is it ridiculous.
I am not saying he would actually play in any of those positions but he can cover almost every position as back up for injuries,how many other players can do that.