Bit harsh, wellsy's posts are normally well thought out and make a lot of sense, this one was a idea tho, he must have been joking...it would be far easier to just try to get planning permission, and if anyone challenges it, just buy their agreement...5 or 6 houses would be effected, give each of em a few thousand not to appeal the new stand. Would doing so be legal?

Ask the people of Green Bay, Wisconsin if they mind a bit of adverse weather and a roof at Lambeau field



Some people are going soft.

American's have 4 extra layers of fat to keep them warm though

Indeed. To which, it would be upto the Council whether we were allowed to build over the top of it or not. It is a major issue as its a public right of way. Also, we'd have to own the houses to the rear of HQ because of the height issue with going back that far. It'd affect the houses sunlight that they receive in the garden and doubt we'd get planning permission on those grounds.

the reason Gary isnt putting a roof on the 'away' end is because frankly we couldnt give a toss about you all

The feeling is mutual.