Its called Internet schizoforumenia. Manifests itself in the sufferer maintaining multiple or serial personas on internet forums. Believed to be connected with Walter Mitty Syndrome in the more harmless cases, or sometimes "Complete Asshole By Proxy", but at worst can be indicative of much more worrying, deap-seated psychological issues. Sometimes the sufferer will "grow out of it" as protracted adolescence eventually progresses into maturity. But in severe cases, the only known treatment (short of defenestration, a socially-frowned upon but understandable remedy for the worst cases of "not being wired up right"icon_wink.gif is the long-standing sociological practice of reward-denial, known colloquially as "banning". There is no cure.

Hi de Hi posts as Rupert Bear on the Dons forum. The same competely negative droll; how much better RL would be if we all reverted to part time, every RFL initiative is a joke & a disgrace & makes me question whether it is worth attending, blah, blah, blah.

Can this be the same poster as posted on the Doncaster board the following, after roundly slagging off another contributor:


It surely can!

That said, if he poked Vastman's anthill, he deserves a medal not censure...

is that a Bradford euphemism for being intimate

Is that a needless and totally unamusing overlay of a crude sexual double-entendre?

I don't understand any of this thread.

Nope. Still not me.

. . . . . and with a user name like that I'm glad it sounds like a sine die ban . . . . . . . however it's the "user" that carried the ban, not the "user name" . . . . . <cough - FFS> . . . . .

Everyone's a to55er.

David Attenborough? Lemmy? Vladimir Putin? Surely not.

Think you may be mixing up the antics of good 'ol country boys, city slickers such as us don't recognise that one.

Incidentally, regarding your sig, isn't the Huddersfield club actually called Sheffield? Unless you've shafted another club since then, and it's been replaced, of course...

Had my first crap since the horse meat scandal broke.

It was good to firm but soft in places

coming from the land of sheep i have heard many euphemisms for getting intimate



and as for the second part of your post you are incorrect.

Hudders field and Shef field were combined. Except the Hudders ate the Sheff and normal service was resumed.

Everyone says that they are hungry enough to eat a horse.

Now they are, and they cant stop fecking complaining

I thank you for confirming what I said, ie you shafted Sheffield.

Personally, my morals wouldn't let me support a club with blood on its hands but I accept others may not be so choosy.

Actually, for DG, Sheffield Eagles Ltd (as was) took over the assets of Huddersfield rlfc. You will see that the current Huddersfield club used to be Sheffield Eagles. But, as DG admits, the net result was rather like the Gateshull "merger", with pretty well all the advantage going to Huddersfield. Taking advantage of a vulnerable club like that, its the sort of conduct you would more expect to see with...lets see, a good example might be the more disreputable payday lenders?

Must admit, I'm really glad our main sponsor is the country's largest, long-established sub-prime lender, not something like an offcumden dodgy payday lender. And was not involved in, for example, selling dodgy home income plans to vulnerable pensioners. Must be horrible knowing the baggage that comes with some club owners, eh?