swap halley for brough? why would wakey do that? why would brough go to bulls(backward step i think)

was halley not farmed out to wakey last season?

in macca we trust? i think not!!

I'd rather keep Halley over Brough anyday.

hope we make some good signings

think reardon could be one of them as know he is talking to a few clubs at mo which include the bulls

halley better than brough, your having a giraffe

Yes he is a better winger/fullback.

'"

halley is a good full back but if it meant swopping him for brough then for the good of the team i would. dont get me wrong would hate to lose halley but think brough would bring alot to our team

So you don't think a Full back is pivotal to a teams success?


Take Webb from Leeds these past couple of years, or Wellens from Saints in 2006 and they wouldn't have been the top 2 sides.

dont be soft! they aint playmakers. take long,pryce,burrow and mcguire and you may be right

A fullback isnt a playmaker?

I think we should just leave him. He's got school in the morning.

not generally though hodgson at shudds is an excellent exception!!

says the man who would rather have halley in his team than brough! keep taking the tablets or see an optician

Because Halley is home grown and 22, and has been sperb this season.

i know mate,amazing what kear can achieve in a short time! brough is home grown and ten times the player halley will ever be

It's alright, when Kear produces a forward of the quality of Burgess or Langley come back then.


Anyway off time for me.

broadbent does the forwards and mcnamara couldnt coach a whippet,nite

What's with the shockingly poor quality trolling?? . . . . ..



If it wasn't so bad it would be funny. . . .


Play with it, if you must, but remember the AUP / don't bite to the point that you breach it and it can then complain . . . . . .

It is certainly poor quality TROLLING but it seems to have been effective.
Why oh! Why do otherwise sensible posters demean themselves by taking the bait like a myopic cod.

I have researched your point for several hours, and consulted with some world fishing authorities. It seems your simile is inappropriate, since the consensus of opinion informs me that a myopic cod would be the least likely to take the bait, on account of not being able to see it.

Quote ="Ferocious Aardvark"I have researched your point for several hours, and consulted with some world fishing authorities. It seems your simile is inappropriate, since the consensus of opinion informs me that a myopic cod would be the least likely to take the bait, on account of not being able to see it. '" Interestingly a decline in cod quality can be traced back to their inability to catch traditional prey & having to resort to scrounging around in the silt on the sea bed, which would suit a myopic cod www.fisherycrisis.com/nscod.htm

Quote ="Ferocious Aardvark"I have researched your point for several hours, and consulted with some world fishing authorities. It seems your simile is inappropriate, since the consensus of opinion informs me that a myopic cod would be the least likely to take the bait, on account of not being able to see it. '" Interestingly a decline in cod quality can be traced back to their inability to catch traditional prey & having to resort to scrounging around in the silt on the sea bed, which would suit a myopic cod www.fisherycrisis.com/nscod.htm

Interestingly a decline in Bull quality can be traced back to their inability to beat traditional prey

chomp,chumps

The Express

says Semi's going.



I can't see why we wouldn't even offer one.


[url=http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/125578/Nero-the-hero-as-Bulls-stay-in-raceClick[/url